<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc strict='yes'?>
<?rfc iprnotified='no'?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-templin-aerolink-71.txt" ipr="trust200902"
     obsoletes="rfc5320, rfc5558, rfc5720, rfc6179, rfc6706">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="AERO">Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)</title>

    <author fullname="Fred L. Templin" initials="F. L." role="editor"
            surname="Templin">
      <organization>Boeing Research &amp; Technology</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>P.O. Box 3707</street>

          <city>Seattle</city>

          <region>WA</region>

          <code>98124</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>fltemplin@acm.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="07" month="September" year="2016"/>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies the operation of IP over tunnel virtual links
      using Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO). Nodes attached to
      AERO links can exchange packets via trusted intermediate routers that
      provide forwarding services to reach off-link destinations and
      redirection services for route optimization. AERO provides an IPv6
      link-local address format known as the AERO address that supports
      operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol and links IPv6 ND
      to IP forwarding. Admission control, address/prefix provisioning and
      mobility are supported by the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
      IPv6 (DHCPv6), and route optimization is naturally supported through
      dynamic neighbor cache updates. Although DHCPv6 and IPv6 ND messaging
      are used in the control plane, both IPv4 and IPv6 are supported in the
      data plane. AERO is a widely-applicable tunneling solution especially
      well suited to mobile Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and other
      applications as described in this document.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>This document specifies the operation of IP over tunnel virtual links
      using Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO). The AERO link can
      be used for tunneling to neighboring nodes over either IPv6 or IPv4
      networks, i.e., AERO views the IPv6 and IPv4 networks as equivalent
      links for tunneling. Nodes attached to AERO links can exchange packets
      via trusted intermediate routers that provide forwarding services to
      reach off-link destinations and redirection services for route
      optimization <xref target="RFC5522"/>.</t>

      <t>AERO provides an IPv6 link-local address format known as the AERO
      address that supports operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND)
      <xref target="RFC4861"/> protocol and links IPv6 ND to IP forwarding.
      Admission control, address/prefix provisioning and mobility are
      supported by the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)
      <xref target="RFC3315"/>, and route optimization is naturally supported
      through dynamic neighbor cache updates. Although DHCPv6 and IPv6 ND
      messaging are used in the control plane, both IPv4 and IPv6 can be used
      in the data plane.</t>

      <t>AERO is applicable to a wide variety of use cases. For example, it
      can be used to coordinate the Virtual Private Network (VPN) links of
      mobile devices (e.g., cellphones, tablets, laptop computers, etc.) that
      connect into a home enterprise network via public access networks. AERO
      can also be applied to aviation applications for both manned and
      unmanned aircraft where the aircraft is treated as a mobile host or
      router that can connect an Internet of Things (IoT). Numerous other use
      cases are also in scope. The remainder of this document presents the
      AERO specification.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The terminology in the normative references applies; the following
      terms are defined within the scope of this document:</t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="AERO link"><vspace/>a Non-Broadcast, Multiple Access
          (NBMA) tunnel virtual overlay configured over a node's attached IPv6
          and/or IPv4 networks. All nodes on the AERO link appear as
          single-hop neighbors from the perspective of the virtual overlay
          even though they may be separated by many underlying network hops.
          AERO can also operate over native multiple access link types (e.g.,
          Ethernet, WiFi etc.) when a tunnel virtual overlay is not
          needed.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to an AERO
          link. Since the addresses assigned to an AERO interface are obtained
          from the unique prefix delegations it receives, AERO interfaces do
          not require Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) and therefore set the
          administrative variable DupAddrDetectTransmits to zero <xref
          target="RFC4862"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO address"><vspace/>an IPv6 link-local address
          constructed as specified in <xref target="aero-address"/> and
          assigned to a Client's AERO interface.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO node"><vspace/>a node that is connected to an AERO
          link and that participates in IPv6 ND and DHCPv6 messaging over the
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Client (&quot;Client&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          issues DHCPv6 messages to receive IP Prefix Delegations (PDs) from
          one or more AERO Servers. Following PD, the Client assigns an AERO
          address to the AERO interface for use in DHCPv6 and IPv6 ND
          exchanges with other AERO nodes.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Server (&quot;Server&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          configures an AERO interface to provide default forwarding and
          DHCPv6 services for AERO Clients. The Server assigns an
          administratively provisioned IPv6 link-local unicast address to
          support the operation of DHCPv6 and the IPv6 ND protocol. An AERO
          Server can also act as an AERO Relay.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Relay (&quot;Relay&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          configures an AERO interface to relay IP packets between nodes on
          the same AERO link and/or forward IP packets between the AERO link
          and the native Internetwork. The Relay assigns an administratively
          provisioned IPv6 link-local unicast address to the AERO interface
          the same as for a Server. An AERO Relay can also act as an AERO
          Server.</t>

          <t
          hangText="AERO Forwarding Agent (&quot;Forwarding Agent&quot;)"><vspace/>a
          node that performs data plane forwarding services as a companion to
          an AERO Server.</t>

          <t hangText="ingress tunnel endpoint (ITE)"><vspace/>an AERO
          interface endpoint that injects tunneled packets into an AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="egress tunnel endpoint (ETE)"><vspace/>an AERO
          interface endpoint that receives tunneled packets from an AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="underlying network"><vspace/>a connected IPv6 or IPv4
          network routing region over which the tunnel virtual overlay is
          configured.</t>

          <t hangText="underlying interface"><vspace/>an AERO node's interface
          point of attachment to an underlying network.</t>

          <t hangText="link-layer address"><vspace/>an IP address assigned to
          an AERO node's underlying interface. When UDP encapsulation is used,
          the UDP port number is also considered as part of the link-layer
          address; otherwise, UDP port number is set to the constant value
          '0'. Link-layer addresses are used as the encapsulation header
          source and destination addresses.</t>

          <t hangText="network layer address"><vspace/>the source or
          destination address of the encapsulated IP packet.</t>

          <t hangText="end user network (EUN)"><vspace/>an internal virtual or
          external edge IP network that an AERO Client connects to the rest of
          the network via the AERO interface.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Service Prefix (ASP)"><vspace/>an IP prefix
          associated with the AERO link and from which more-specific AERO
          Client Prefixes (ACPs) are derived.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Client Prefix (ACP)"><vspace/>an IP prefix derived
          from an ASP and delegated to a Client, where the ACP prefix length
          must be no shorter than the ASP prefix length and must be no longer
          than 64 for IPv6 or 32 for IPv4.</t>
        </list>Throughout the document, the simple terms "Client", "Server"
      and "Relay" refer to "AERO Client", "AERO Server" and "AERO Relay",
      respectively. Capitalization is used to distinguish these terms from
      DHCPv6 client/server/relay <xref target="RFC3315"/>.</t>

      <t>The terminology of DHCPv6 <xref target="RFC3315"/> and IPv6 ND <xref
      target="RFC4861"/> (including the names of node variables and protocol
      constants) applies to this document. Also throughout the document, the
      term "IP" is used to generically refer to either Internet Protocol
      version (i.e., IPv4 or IPv6).</t>

      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
      Lower case uses of these words are not to be interpreted as carrying
      RFC2119 significance.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="aerospec"
             title="Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)">
      <t>The following sections specify the operation of IP over Asymmetric
      Extended Route Optimization (AERO) links:</t>

      <section anchor="aerolink" title="AERO Link Reference Model">
        <t><figure anchor="chaining-fig" title="AERO Link Reference Model">
            <artwork><![CDATA[                           .-(::::::::)
                        .-(:::: IP ::::)-.
                       (:: Internetwork ::)
                        `-(::::::::::::)-'
                           `-(::::::)-' 
                                |
    +--------------+   +--------+-------+   +--------------+
    |AERO Server S1|   | AERO Relay R1  |   |AERO Server S2|
    |  Nbr: C1; R1 |   |   Nbr: S1; S2  |   |  Nbr: C2; R1 |
    |  default->R1 |   |(P1->S1; P2->S2)|   |  default->R1 |
    |    P1->C1    |   |      ASP A1    |   |    P2->C2    |
    +-------+------+   +--------+-------+   +------+-------+
            |                   |                  |
    X---+---+-------------------+------------------+---+---X
        |                  AERO Link                   |
  +-----+--------+                            +--------+-----+
  |AERO Client C1|                            |AERO Client C2|
  |    Nbr: S1   |                            |   Nbr: S2    |
  | default->S1  |                            | default->S2  |
  |    ACP P1    |                            |    ACP P2    |
  +--------------+                            +--------------+
        .-.                                         .-.
     ,-(  _)-.                                   ,-(  _)-.
  .-(_   IP  )-.                              .-(_   IP  )-.
 (__    EUN      )                           (__    EUN      )
    `-(______)-'                                `-(______)-'
         |                                           |
     +--------+                                  +--------+
     | Host H1|                                  | Host H2|
     +--------+                                  +--------+
]]></artwork>
          </figure><xref target="chaining-fig"/> presents the AERO link
        reference model. In this model:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>AERO Relay R1 aggregates AERO Service Prefix (ASP) A1, acts as
            a default router for its associated Servers S1 and S2, and
            connects the AERO link to the rest of the IP Internetwork.</t>

            <t>AERO Servers S1 and S2 associate with Relay R1 and also act as
            default routers for their associated Clients C1 and C2.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients C1 and C2 associate with Servers S1 and S2,
            respectively. They receive AERO Client Prefix (ACP) delegations P1
            and P2, and also act as default routers for their associated
            physical or internal virtual EUNs. (Alternatively, clients can act
            as multi-addressed hosts without serving any EUNs).</t>

            <t>Simple hosts H1 and H2 attach to the EUNs served by Clients C1
            and C2, respectively.</t>
          </list>Each AERO node maintains an AERO interface neighbor cache and
        an IP forwarding table. For example, AERO Relay R1 in the diagram has
        neighbor cache entries for Servers S1 and S2 as well as IP forwarding
        table entries for the ACPs delegated to Clients C1 and C2. In common
        operational practice, there may be many additional Relays, Servers and
        Clients. (Although not shown in the figure, AERO Forwarding Agents may
        also be provided for data plane forwarding offload services.)</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="node-types" title="AERO Link Node Types">
        <t>AERO Relays provide default forwarding services to AERO Servers.
        Relays forward packets between neighbors connected to the same AERO
        link and also forward packets between the AERO link and the native IP
        Internetwork. Relays present the AERO link to the native Internetwork
        as a set of one or more AERO Service Prefixes (ASPs) and serve as a
        gateway between the AERO link and the Internetwork. AERO Relays
        maintain an AERO interface neighbor cache entry for each AERO Server,
        and maintain an IP forwarding table entry for each AERO Client Prefix
        (ACP). AERO Relays can also be configured to act as AERO Servers.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers provide default forwarding services to AERO Clients.
        Each Server also peers with each Relay in a dynamic routing protocol
        instance to advertise its list of associated ACPs. Servers configure a
        DHCPv6 server function to facilitate Prefix Delegation (PD) exchanges
        with Clients. Each delegated prefix becomes an ACP taken from an ASP.
        Servers forward packets between AERO interface neighbors, and maintain
        an AERO interface neighbor cache entry for each AERO Relay. They also
        maintain both neighbor cache entries and IP forwarding table entries
        for each of their associated Clients. AERO Servers can also be
        configured to act as AERO Relays.</t>

        <t>AERO Clients act as requesting routers to receive ACPs through
        DHCPv6 PD exchanges with AERO Servers over the AERO link. Each Client
        MAY associate with a single Server or with multiple Servers, e.g., for
        fault tolerance, load balancing, etc. Each IPv6 Client receives at
        least a /64 IPv6 ACP, and may receive even shorter prefixes.
        Similarly, each IPv4 Client receives at least a /32 IPv4 ACP (i.e., a
        singleton IPv4 address), and may receive even shorter prefixes. AERO
        Clients maintain an AERO interface neighbor cache entry for each of
        their associated Servers as well as for each of their correspondent
        Clients.</t>

        <t>AERO Forwarding Agents provide data plane forwarding services as
        companions to AERO Servers. Note that while Servers are required to
        perform both control and data plane operations on their own behalf,
        they may optionally enlist the services of special-purpose Forwarding
        Agents to offload data plane traffic.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aero-address" title="AERO Addresses">
        <t>An AERO address is an IPv6 link-local address with an embedded ACP
        and assigned to a Client's AERO interface. The AERO address remains
        stable as the Client moves between topological locations, i.e., even
        if its link-layer addresses change.</t>

        <t>For IPv6, the AERO address begins with the prefix fe80::/64 and
        includes in its interface identifier (i.e., the lower 64 bits) the
        base prefix taken from the Client's IPv6 ACP. The base prefix is
        determined by masking the ACP with the prefix length. For example, if
        the AERO Client receives the IPv6 ACP:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>2001:db8:1000:2000::/56</t>
          </list>it constructs its AERO address as:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::2001:db8:1000:2000</t>
          </list>For IPv4, the AERO address is based on an IPv4-mapped IPv6
        address <xref target="RFC4291"/> formed from the ACP and with a Prefix
        Length of 96 plus the ACP prefix length. For example, for the IPv4 ACP
        192.0.2.32/28 the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address is:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:192.0.2.32/124</t>
          </list>The Client then constructs its AERO address with the prefix
        fe80::/64 and with the lower 64 bits of the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address
        in the interface identifier as:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::FFFF:192.0.2.32</t>
          </list>NOTE: In some cases, prospective neighbors may not have
        advanced knowledge of the Client's ACP length and may therefore send
        initial IPv6 ND messages with an AERO destination address that matches
        the ACP but does not correspond to the base prefix. For example, if
        the Client receives the IPv6 ACP 2001:db8:1000:2000::/56 then
        subsequently receives an IPv6 ND message with destination address
        fe80::2001:db8:1000:2001, it accepts the message as though it were
        addressed to fe80::2001:db8:1000:2000.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="interface" title="AERO Interface Characteristics">
        <t>AERO interfaces use encapsulation (see: <xref
        target="aeroencaps"/>) to exchange packets with neighbors attached to
        the AERO link.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces maintain a neighbor cache, and AERO nodes use both
        DHCPv6 and IPv6 ND control messaging to manage the creation,
        modification and deletion of neighbor cache entries.</t>

        <t>AERO Clients send DHCPv6 Solicit, Rebind, Renew and Release
        messages to AERO Servers, which respond with DHCPv6 Reply messages.
        AERO nodes use unicast IPv6 ND Neighbor Solicitation (NS), Neighbor
        Advertisement (NA), Router Solicitation (RS) and Router Advertisement
        (RA) messages the same as for any IPv6 link.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces use two IPv6 ND redirection message types -- the
        first known as a Predirect message and the second being the standard
        Redirect message (see <xref target="predirect"/>).</t>

        <t>AERO interface ND messages include one or more Source/Target
        Link-Layer Address Options (S/TLLAOs) formatted as shown in <xref
        target="llaov6"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="llaov6"
            title="AERO Source/Target Link-Layer Address Option (S/TLLAO) Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      Type     |   Length = 5  |          Reserved1            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |   Reserved2   | Interface ID  |        UDP Port Number        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     +                                                               +
     |                                                               |
     +                          IP Address                           +
     |                                                               |
     +                                                               +
     |                                                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |P00|P01|P02|P03|P04|P05|P06|P07|P08|P09|P10|P11|P12|P13|P14|P15|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |P16|P17|P18|P19|P20|P21|P22|P23|P24|P25|P26|P27|P28|P29|P30|P31|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |P32|P33|P34|P35|P36|P37|P38|P39|P40|P41|P42|P43|P44|P45|P46|P47|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |P48|P49|P50|P51|P52|P53|P54|P55|P56|P57|P58|P59|P60|P61|P62|P63|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>In this format:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type is set to '1' for SLLAO or '2' for TLLAO the same as for
            IPv6 ND.</t>

            <t>Length is set to the constant value '5' (i.e., 5 units of 8
            octets).</t>

            <t>Both Reserved fields are set to the value '0' on transmission
            and ignored on receipt.</t>

            <t>Interface ID is set to an integer value between 0 and 255
            corresponding to an underlying interface of the AERO node.</t>

            <t>UDP Port Number and IP Address are set to the addresses used by
            the AERO node when it sends encapsulated packets over the
            underlying interface. When UDP is not used as part of the
            encapsulation, UDP Port Number is set to the value '0'. When the
            encapsulation IP address family is IPv4, IP Address is formed as
            an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address as specified in <xref
            target="aero-address"/>.</t>

            <t>P[i] is a set of 64 Preference values that correspond to the 64
            Differentiated Service Code Point (DSCP) values <xref
            target="RFC2474"/>. Each P(i) is set to the value '0'
            ("disabled"), '1' ("low"), '2' ("medium") or '3' ("high") to
            indicate a preference level for packet forwarding purposes.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>AERO interfaces may be configured over multiple underlying
        interfaces. For example, common mobile handheld devices have both
        wireless local area network ("WLAN") and cellular wireless links.
        These links are typically used "one at a time" with low-cost WLAN
        preferred and highly-available cellular wireless as a standby. In a
        more complex example, aircraft frequently have many wireless data link
        types (e.g. satellite-based, cellular, terrestrial, air-to-air
        directional, etc.) with diverse performance and cost properties.</t>

        <t>If a Client's multiple underlying interfaces are used "one at a
        time" (i.e., all other interfaces are in standby mode while one
        interface is active), then IPv6 ND messages include only a single
        S/TLLAO with Interface ID set to a constant value.</t>

        <t>If the Client has multiple active underlying interfaces, then from
        the perspective of IPv6 ND it would appear to have multiple link-layer
        addresses. In that case, IPv6 ND messages MAY include multiple
        S/TLLAOs -- each with an Interface ID that corresponds to a specific
        underlying interface of the AERO node.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerolinkinit" title="AERO Link Registration">
        <t>When an administrative authority first deploys a set of AERO Relays
        and Servers that comprise an AERO link, they also assign a unique
        domain name for the link, e.g., "linkupnetworks.example.com". Next, if
        administrative policy permits Clients within the domain to serve as
        correspondent nodes for Internet mobile nodes, the administrative
        authority adds a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) for each of the
        AERO link's ASPs to the Domain Name System (DNS) <xref
        target="RFC1035"/>. The FQDN is based on the suffix
        "aero.linkupnetworks.net" with a prefix formed from the
        wildcard-terminated reverse mapping of the ASP <xref
        target="RFC3596"/><xref target="RFC4592"/>, and resolves to a DNS PTR
        resource record. For example, for the ASP '2001:db8:1::/48' within the
        domain name "linkupnetworks.example.com", the DNS database
        contains:</t>

        <t>'*.1.0.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.aero.linkupnetworks.net. PTR
        linkupnetworks.example.com'</t>

        <t>This DNS registration advertises the AERO link's ASPs to
        prospective correspondent nodes.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroinit" title="AERO Interface Initialization">
        <section anchor="rinit" title="AERO Relay Behavior">
          <t>When a Relay enables an AERO interface, it first assigns an
          administratively provisioned link-local address fe80::ID to the
          interface. Each fe80::ID address MUST be unique among all AERO nodes
          on the link, and MUST NOT collide with any potential AERO addresses
          nor the special addresses fe80:: and fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff. (The
          fe80::ID addresses are typically taken from the available range
          fe80::/96, e.g., as fe80::1, fe80::2, fe80::3, etc.) The Relay then
          engages in a dynamic routing protocol session with all Servers on
          the link (see: <xref target="scaling"/>), and advertises its
          assigned ASPs into the native IP Internetwork.</t>

          <t>Each Relay subsequently maintains an IP forwarding table entry
          for each ACP covered by its ASP(s), and maintains a neighbor cache
          entry for each Server on the link. Relays exchange NS/NA messages
          with AERO link neighbors the same as for any AERO node, however they
          typically do not perform explicit Neighbor Unreachability Detection
          (NUD) (see: <xref target="nud"/>) since the dynamic routing protocol
          already provides reachability confirmation.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sinit" title="AERO Server Behavior">
          <t>When a Server enables an AERO interface, it assigns an
          administratively provisioned link-local address fe80::ID the same as
          for Relays. The Server further configures a DHCPv6 server function
          to facilitate DHCPv6 PD exchanges with AERO Clients. The Server
          maintains a neighbor cache entry for each Relay on the link, and
          manages per-ACP neighbor cache entries and IP forwarding table
          entries based on control message exchanges. Each Server also engages
          in a dynamic routing protocol with each Relay on the link (see:
          <xref target="scaling"/>).</t>

          <t>When the Server receives an NS/RS message from a Client on the
          AERO interface it returns an NA/RA message. The Server further
          provides a simple link-layer conduit between AERO interface
          neighbors. In particular, when a packet sent by a source Client
          arrives on the Server's AERO interface and is destined to another of
          the Server's Clients, the Server forwards the packet at the link
          layer without ever disturbing the network layer and without ever
          leaving the AERO interface.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="cinit" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>When a Client enables an AERO interface, it uses the special
          address fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff to obtain one or more ACPs from an
          AERO Server via DHCPv6 PD. Next, it assigns the corresponding AERO
          address(es) to the AERO interface and creates a neighbor cache entry
          for the Server, i.e., the DHCPv6 PD exchange bootstraps
          autoconfiguration of unique link-local address(es). The Client
          maintains a neighbor cache entry for each of its Servers and each of
          its active correspondent Clients. When the Client receives
          Redirect/Predirect messages on the AERO interface it updates or
          creates neighbor cache entries, including link-layer address
          information.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="feinit" title="AERO Forwarding Agent Behavior">
          <t>When a Forwarding Agent enables an AERO interface, it assigns the
          same link-local address(es) as the companion AERO Server. The
          Forwarding Agent thereafter provides data plane forwarding services
          based solely on the forwarding information assigned to it by the
          companion AERO Server.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="scaling" title="AERO Routing System">
        <t>The AERO routing system is based on a private instance of the
        Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) <xref target="RFC4271"/> that is
        coordinated between Relays and Servers and does not interact with
        either the public Internet BGP routing system or the native IP
        Internetwork interior routing system. Relays advertise only a small
        and unchanging set of ASPs to the native routing system instead of the
        full dynamically changing set of ACPs.</t>

        <t>In a reference deployment, each AERO Server is configured as an
        Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) for a stub Autonomous System
        (AS) using an AS Number (ASN) that is unique within the BGP instance,
        and each Server further peers with each Relay but does not peer with
        other Servers. Similarly, Relays do not peer with each other, since
        they will reliably receive all updates from all Servers and will
        therefore have a consistent view of the AERO link ACP delegations.</t>

        <t>Each Server maintains a working set of associated ACPs, and
        dynamically announces new ACPs and withdraws departed ACPs in its BGP
        updates to Relays. Clients are expected to remain associated with
        their current Servers for extended timeframes, however Servers SHOULD
        selectively suppress BGP updates for impatient Clients that repeatedly
        associate and disassociate with them in order to dampen routing
        churn.</t>

        <t>Each Relay configures a black-hole route for each of its ASPs. By
        black-holing the ASPs, the Relay will maintain forwarding table
        entries only for the ACPs that are currently active, and all other
        ACPs will correctly result in destination unreachable failures due to
        the black hole route. Relays do not send BGP updates for ACPs to
        Servers, but instead originate a default route. In this way, Servers
        have only partial topology knowledge (i.e., they know only about the
        ACPs of their directly associated Cliens) and they forward all other
        packets to Relays which have full topology knowledge.</t>

        <t>Scaling properties of the AERO routing system are limited by the
        number of BGP routes that can be carried by Relays. Assuming O(10^6)
        as a reasonable maximum number of BGP routes, this means that O(10^6)
        Clients can be serviced by a single set of Relays. A means of
        increasing scaling would be to assign a different set of Relays for
        each set of ASPs. In that case, each Server still peers with each
        Relay, but the Server institutes route filters so that each set of
        Relays only receives BGP updates for the ASPs they aggregate. For
        example, if the ASP for the AERO link is 2001:db8::/32, a first set of
        Relays could service the ASP segment 2001:db8::/40, a second set of
        Relays could service 2001:db8:0100::/40, a third set could service
        2001:db8:0200::/40, etc.</t>

        <t>Assuming up to O(10^3) sets of Relays, the AERO routing system can
        then accommodate O(10^9) ACPs with no additional overhead for Servers
        and Relays (for example, it should be possible to service 4 billion
        /64 ACPs taken from a /32 ASP and even more for shorter ASPs). In this
        way, each set of Relays services a specific set of ASPs that they
        advertise to the native routing system, and each Server configures
        ASP-specific routes that list the correct set of Relays as next hops.
        This arrangement also allows for natural incremental deployment, and
        can support small scale initial deployments followed by dynamic
        deployment of additional Clients, Servers and Relays without
        disturbing the already-deployed base.</t>

        <t>Note that in an alternate routing arrangement each set of Relays
        could advertise the aggregated ASP for the link into the native
        routing system even though each Relay services only a segment of the
        ASP. In that case, a Relay upon receiving a packet with a destination
        address covered by the ASP segment of another Relay can simply tunnel
        the packet to the correct Relay. The tradeoff then is the penalty for
        Relay-to-Relay tunneling compared with reduced routing information in
        the native routing system.</t>

        <t>Finally, Realys can express preferences for ACPs learned from
        multiple Servers by assigning a BGP weight to each Server's peering
        configuration. In this way Relays can choose the Serevr with the
        highest weight as the preferred path, and then fail over to a Server
        with lower weight in case of ACP withdrawl or Server failure.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroncache"
               title="AERO Interface Neighbor Cache Maintenace">
        <t>Each AERO interface maintains a conceptual neighbor cache that
        includes an entry for each neighbor it communicates with on the AERO
        link, the same as for any IPv6 interface <xref target="RFC4861"/>.
        AERO interface neighbor cache entires are said to be one of
        "permanent", "static" or "dynamic".</t>

        <t>Permanent neighbor cache entries are created through explicit
        administrative action; they have no timeout values and remain in place
        until explicitly deleted. AERO Relays maintain a permanent neighbor
        cache entry for each Server on the link, and AERO Servers maintain a
        permanent neighbor cache entry for each Relay. Each entry maintains
        the mapping between the neighbor's fe80::ID network-layer address and
        corresponding link-layer address.</t>

        <t>Static neighbor cache entries are created through DHCPv6 PD
        exchanges as specified in <xref target="aeropd"/> and remain in place
        for durations bounded by prefix lifetimes. AERO Servers maintain
        static neighbor cache entries for the ACPs of each of their associated
        Clients, and AERO Clients maintain a static neighbor cache entry for
        each of their associated Servers. When an AERO Server sends a Reply
        message response to a Client's Solicit, Rebind or Renew message, it
        creates or updates a static neighbor cache entry based on the Client's
        DHCP Unique Identifier (DUID) as the Client identifier, the AERO
        address(es) corresponding to the Client's ACP(s) as the network-layer
        address(es), the prefix lifetime as the neighbor cache entry lifetime,
        the Client's encapsulation IP address and UDP port number as the
        link-layer address and the prefix length(s) as the length to apply to
        the AERO address(es). When an AERO Client receives a Reply message
        from a Server, it creates or updates a static neighbor cache entry
        based on the Reply message link-local source address as the
        network-layer address, the prefix lifetime as the neighbor cache entry
        lifetime, and the encapsulation IP source address and UDP source port
        number as the link-layer address.</t>

        <t>Dynamic neighbor cache entries are created or updated based on
        receipt of a Predirect/Redirect message as specified in <xref
        target="predirect"/>, and are garbage-collected when keepalive timers
        expire. AERO Clients maintain dynamic neighbor cache entries for each
        of their active correspondent Client ACPs with lifetimes based on IPv6
        ND messaging constants. When an AERO Client receives a valid Predirect
        message it creates or updates a dynamic neighbor cache entry for the
        Predirect target network-layer and link-layer addresses plus prefix
        length. The node then sets an "AcceptTime" variable in the neighbor
        cache entry to ACCEPT_TIME seconds and uses this value to determine
        whether packets received from the correspondent can be accepted. When
        an AERO Client receives a valid Redirect message it creates or updates
        a dynamic neighbor cache entry for the Redirect target network-layer
        and link-layer addresses plus prefix length. The Client then sets a
        "ForwardTime" variable in the neighbor cache entry to FORWARD_TIME
        seconds and uses this value to determine whether packets can be sent
        directly to the correspondent. The Client also sets a "MaxRetry"
        variable to MAX_RETRY to limit the number of keepalives sent when a
        correspondent may have gone unreachable.</t>

        <t>It is RECOMMENDED that FORWARD_TIME be set to the default constant
        value 30 seconds to match the default REACHABLE_TIME value specified
        for IPv6 ND <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>It is RECOMMENDED that ACCEPT_TIME be set to the default constant
        value 40 seconds to allow a 10 second window so that the AERO
        redirection procedure can converge before AcceptTime decrements below
        FORWARD_TIME.</t>

        <t>It is RECOMMENDED that MAX_RETRY be set to 3 the same as described
        for IPv6 ND address resolution in Section 7.3.3 of <xref
        target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>Different values for FORWARD_TIME, ACCEPT_TIME, and MAX_RETRY MAY
        be administratively set, if necessary, to better match the AERO link's
        performance characteristics; however, if different values are chosen,
        all nodes on the link MUST consistently configure the same values.
        Most importantly, ACCEPT_TIME SHOULD be set to a value that is
        sufficiently longer than FORWARD_TIME to allow the AERO redirection
        procedure to converge.</t>

        <t>When there may be a Network Address Translator (NAT) between the
        Client and the Server, or if the path from the Client to the Server
        should be tested for reachability, the Client can send periodic RS
        messages to the Server to receive RA replies. The RS/RA messaging will
        keep NAT state alive and test Server reachability without disturbing
        the DHCPv6 server.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroalg" title="AERO Interface Sending Algorithm">
        <t>IP packets enter a node's AERO interface either from the network
        layer (i.e., from a local application or the IP forwarding system), or
        from the link layer (i.e., from the AERO tunnel virtual link). Packets
        that enter the AERO interface from the network layer are encapsulated
        and admitted into the AERO link, i.e., they are tunnelled to an AERO
        interface neighbor. Packets that enter the AERO interface from the
        link layer are either re-admitted into the AERO link or delivered to
        the network layer where they are subject to either local delivery or
        IP forwarding. Since each AERO node may have only partial information
        about neighbors on the link, AERO interfaces may forward packets with
        link-local destination addresses at a layer below the network layer.
        This means that AERO nodes act as both IP routers/hosts and sub-IP
        layer forwarding nodes. AERO interface sending considerations for
        Clients, Servers and Relays are given below.</t>

        <t>When an IP packet enters a Client's AERO interface from the network
        layer, if the destination is covered by an ASP the Client searches for
        a dynamic neighbor cache entry with a non-zero ForwardTime and an AERO
        address that matches the packet's destination address. (The
        destination address may be either an address covered by the neighbor's
        ACP or the (link-local) AERO address itself.) If there is a match, the
        Client uses a link-layer address in the entry as the link-layer
        address for encapsulation then admits the packet into the AERO link.
        If there is no match, the Client instead uses the link-layer address
        of a neighboring Server as the link-layer address for
        encapsulation.</t>

        <t>When an IP packet enters a Server's AERO interface from the link
        layer, if the destination is covered by an ASP the Server searches for
        a neighbor cache entry with an AERO address that matches the packet's
        destination address. (The destination address may be either an address
        covered by the neighbor's ACP or the AERO address itself.) If there is
        a match, the Server uses a link-layer address in the entry as the
        link-layer address for encapsulation and re-admits the packet into the
        AERO link. If there is no match, the Server instead uses the
        link-layer address in a permanent neighbor cache entry for a Relay
        selected through longest-prefix-match as the link-layer address for
        encapsulation.</t>

        <t>When an IP packet enters a Relay's AERO interface from the network
        layer, the Relay searches its IP forwarding table for an entry that is
        covered by an ASP and also matches the destination. If there is a
        match, the Relay uses the link-layer address in the corresponding
        neighbor cache entry as the link-layer address for encapsulation and
        admits the packet into the AERO link. When an IP packet enters a
        Relay's AERO interface from the link-layer, if the destination is not
        a link-local address and does not match an ASP the Relay removes the
        packet from the AERO interface and uses IP forwarding to forward the
        packet to the Internetwork. If the destination address is a link-local
        address or a non-link-local address that matches an ASP, and there is
        a more-specific ACP entry in the IP forwarding table, the Relay uses
        the link-layer address in the corresponding neighbor cache entry as
        the link-layer address for encapsulation and re-admits the packet into
        the AERO link. When an IP packet enters a Relay's AERO interface from
        either the network layer or link-layer, and the packet's destination
        address matches an ASP but there is no more-specific ACP entry, the
        Relay drops the packet and returns an ICMP Destination Unreachable
        message (see: <xref target="aeroerr"/>).</t>

        <t>When an AERO Server receives a packet from a Relay via the AERO
        interface, the Server MUST NOT forward the packet back to the same or
        a different Relay.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Relay receives a packet from a Server via the AERO
        interface, the Relay MUST NOT forward the packet back to the same
        Server.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node re-admits a packet into the AERO link without
        involving the network layer, the node MUST NOT decrement the network
        layer TTL/Hop-count.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node forwards a data packet to the primary link-layer
        address of a Server, it may receive Redirect messages with an SLLAO
        that include the link-layer address of an AERO Forwarding Agent. The
        AERO node SHOULD record the link-layer address in the neighbor cache
        entry for the neighbor and send subsequent data packets via this
        address instead of the Server's primary address (see: <xref
        target="aeropd-agent"/>).</t>

        <t>AERO nodes may have multiple underlying interfaces and/or neighbor
        cache entries for Clients with multiple Interface ID registrations
        (see <xref target="interface"/>). The AERO node uses the packet's DSCP
        value to select the outgoing underlying interface based on its own
        Interface ID preference values and to select the destination
        link-layer address based on the neighbor's Interface ID with the
        highest preference value. If multiple Interface IDs have a preference
        of "high", the AERO node sends one copy of the packet to each of the
        link-layer addresses (i.e., it replicates the packet); otherwise, the
        node sends a single copy of the packet.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroencaps"
               title="AERO Interface Encapsulation and Re-encapsulation">
        <t>AERO interfaces encapsulate IP packets according to whether they
        are entering the AERO interface from the network layer or if they are
        being re-admitted into the same AERO link they arrived on. This latter
        form of encapsulation is known as "re-encapsulation".</t>

        <t>The AERO interface encapsulates packets per the Generic UDP
        Encapsulation (GUE) encapsulation procedures in <xref
        target="I-D.ietf-nvo3-gue"/><xref
        target="I-D.herbert-gue-fragmentation"/>, or through an alternate
        encapsulation format (see: <xref target="minimal"/>). For packets
        entering the AERO link from the IP layer, the AERO interface copies
        the "TTL/Hop Limit", "Type of Service/Traffic Class" <xref
        target="RFC2983"/>, "Flow Label"<xref target="RFC6438"> </xref>.(for
        IPv6) and "Congestion Experienced" <xref target="RFC3168"/> values in
        the packet's IP header into the corresponding fields in the
        encapsulation IP header. For packets undergoing re-encapsulation
        within the AERO link, the AERO interface instead copies the "TTL/Hop
        Limit", "Type of Service/Traffic Class", "Flow Label" and "Congestion
        Experienced" values in the original encapsulation IP header into the
        corresponding fields in the new encapsulation IP header, i.e., the
        values are transferred between encapsulation headers and *not* copied
        from the encapsulated packet's network-layer header.</t>

        <t>When GUE encapsulation is used, the AERO interface next sets the
        UDP source port to a constant value that it will use in each
        successive packet it sends, and sets the UDP length field to the
        length of the encapsulated packet plus 8 bytes for the UDP header
        itself plus the length of the GUE header (or 0 if GUE direct IP
        encapsulation is used). For packets sent to a Server, the AERO
        interface sets the UDP destination port to 8060, i.e., the
        IANA-registered port number for AERO. For packets sent to a
        correspondent Client, the AERO interface sets the UDP destination port
        to the port value stored in the neighbor cache entry for this
        correspondent. The AERO interface then either includes or omits the
        UDP checksum according to the GUE specification.</t>

        <t>For IPv4 encapsulation, the AERO interface sets the DF bit as
        discussed in <xref target="aeromtu"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerodecaps" title="AERO Interface Decapsulation">
        <t>AERO interfaces decapsulate packets destined either to the AERO
        node itself or to a destination reached via an interface other than
        the AERO interface the packet was received on. Decapsulation is per
        the procedures specified for the appropriate encapsulation format.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroauth"
               title="AERO Interface Data Origin Authentication">
        <t>AERO nodes employ simple data origin authentication procedures for
        encapsulated packets they receive from other nodes on the AERO link.
        In particular:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>AERO Servers and Relays accept encapsulated packets with a
            link-layer source address that matches a permanent neighbor cache
            entry.</t>

            <t>AERO Servers accept authentic encapsulated DHCPv6 messages from
            Clients, and create or update a static neighbor cache entry for
            the Client based on the specific DHCPv6 message type.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients and Servers accept encapsulated packets if there
            is a static neighbor cache entry with a link-layer address that
            matches the packet's link-layer source address.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients, Servers and Relays accept encapsulated packets if
            there is a dynamic neighbor cache entry with an AERO address that
            matches the packet's network-layer source address, with a
            link-layer address that matches the packet's link-layer source
            address, and with a non-zero AcceptTime.</t>
          </list>Note that this simple data origin authentication is effective
        in environments in which link-layer addresses cannot be spoofed. In
        other environments, each AERO message must include a signature that
        the recipient can use to authenticate the message origin.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromtu" title="AERO Interface Packet Size Issues">
        <t>The AERO interface is the node's attachment to the AERO link. The
        AERO interface acts as a tunnel ingress when it sends a packet to an
        AERO link neighbor and as a tunnel egress when it receives a packet
        from an AERO link neighbor. AERO interfaces observe the packet sizing
        considerations for tunnels discussed in <xref
        target="I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"/> and as specified below.</t>

        <t>IPv6 specifies a minimum link Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of
        1280 bytes <xref target="RFC2460"/>. Although IPv4 specifies a smaller
        minimum link MTU of 68 bytes <xref target="RFC0791"/>, AERO interfaces
        also observe the IPv6 minimum for IPv4 even if the packet may incur
        fragmentation in the network.</t>

        <t>IPv6 specifies a minimum Maximum Reassembly Unit (MRU) of 1500
        bytes <xref target="RFC2460"/>, while the minimum MRU for IPv4 is only
        576 bytes <xref target="RFC1122"/> (note that IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels
        assume a larger MRU than the IPv4 minimum).</t>

        <t>Original sources expect that IP packets will either be delivered to
        the final destination or a suitable Packet Too Big (PTB) message
        returned. However, PTB messages may be crafted for malicious purposes
        such as denial of service, or lost in the network <xref
        target="RFC2923"/> resulting in failure of the IP Path MTU Discovery
        (PMTUD) mechanisms <xref target="RFC1191"/><xref target="RFC1981"/>.
        For these reasons, AERO links employ operational procedures that avoid
        all interactions with PMTUD.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers advertise an MTU that MUST be no smaller than 1280
        bytes, MUST be no larger than the minimum MRU among all nodes on the
        AERO link minus the encapsulation overhead ("ENCAPS"), and SHOULD be
        no smaller than 1500 bytes. AERO Servers advertise a Maximum Fragment
        Unit (MFU) as the maximum size for the fragments of an encapsulated
        packet that require fragmentation. The MFU value MUST NOT be larger
        than (MTU+ENCAPS) and MUST NOT be larger than 1280 bytes unless there
        is operational assurance that a larger size can traverse the link
        along all paths without fragmentation.</t>

        <t>AERO Clients set the AERO interface MTU/MFU based on the values
        advertised by their Server, and configure an MRU large enough to
        reassemble packets up to (MTU+ENCAPS) bytes.</t>

        <t>All AERO nodes on the link MUST configure the same MTU/MFU values
        for reasons cited in <xref target="RFC3819"/><xref target="RFC4861"/>
        (in particular, multicast support requires a common MTU value among
        all nodes on the link).</t>

        <t>All AERO nodes on the link MUST configure a minimum MRU of
        (1500+ENCAPS) bytes, and SHOULD be capable of setting a larger MRU
        accoding to the Server's advertised MTU.</t>

        <t>In accordnace with these requirements, the ingress accommodates
        packets of various sizes as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>First, for each original IPv4 packet that is larger than the
            AERO interface MTU and with the DF bit set to 0, the ingress uses
            IPv4 fragmentation to break the packet into a minimum number of
            non-overlapping fragments where the first fragment is no larger
            than (MFU-ENCAPS) bytes and the remaining fragments are no larger
            than the first.</t>

            <t>Next, for each original IP packet or fragment that is no larger
            than (MFU-ENCAPS) bytes, the ingress encapsulates the packet and
            admits it into the tunnel. For IPv4 AERO links, the ingress sets
            the Don't Fragment (DF) bit to 0 so that these packets will be
            delivered to the egress even if some fragmentation occurs in the
            network.</t>

            <t>For all other original IP packets or fragments, if the packet
            is larger than the AERO interface MTU, the ingress drops the
            packet and returns a PTB message to the original source.
            Otherwise, the ingress encapsulates the packet and fragments the
            encapsulated packet into a minimum number of non-overlapping
            fragments where the first fragment is no larger than MFU bytes and
            the remaining fragments are no larger than the first. The ingress
            then admits the fragments into the tunnel, and for IPv4 sets the
            DF bit to 0 in the IP encapsulation header. These fragmented
            encapsulated packets will be delivered to the egress, which
            reassembles them into a whole packet.</t>
          </list>Several factors must be considered when fragmentation of the
        encapsulated packet is needed. For AERO links over IPv4, the IP ID
        field is only 16 bits in length, meaning that fragmentation at high
        data rates could result in data corruption due to reassembly
        misassociations <xref target="RFC6864"/><xref target="RFC4963"/>. For
        AERO links over both IPv4 and IPv6, studies have also shown that IP
        fragments are dropped unconditionally over some network paths
        [I-D.taylor-v6ops-fragdrop]. In environments where IP fragmentation
        issues could result in operational problems, the ingress SHOULD employ
        intermediate-layer fragmentation (see: <xref target="RFC2764"/> and
        <xref target="I-D.herbert-gue-fragmentation"/>) before appending the
        outer encapsulation headers to each fragment.</t>

        <t>Since the encapsulation fragment header reduces the room available
        for packet data, but the original source has no way to control its
        insertion, the ingress MUST include the fragment header length in the
        ENCAPS length even for packets in which the header is absent.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroerr" title="AERO Interface Error Handling">
        <t>When an AERO node admits encapsulated packets into the AERO
        interface, it may receive link-layer (L2) or network-layer (L3) error
        indications.</t>

        <t>An L2 error indication is an ICMP error message generated by a
        router on the path to the neighbor or by the neighbor itself. The
        message includes an IP header with the address of the node that
        generated the error as the source address and with the link-layer
        address of the AERO node as the destination address.</t>

        <t>The IP header is followed by an ICMP header that includes an error
        Type, Code and Checksum. Valid type values include "Destination
        Unreachable", "Time Exceeded" and "Parameter Problem" <xref
        target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>. (AERO interfaces ignore
        all L2 IPv4 "Fragmentation Needed" and IPv6 "Packet Too Big" messages
        since they only emit packets that are guaranteed to be no larger than
        the IP minimum link MTU.)</t>

        <t>The ICMP header is followed by the leading portion of the packet
        that generated the error, also known as the "packet-in-error". For
        ICMPv6, <xref target="RFC4443"/> specifies that the packet-in-error
        includes: "As much of invoking packet as possible without the ICMPv6
        packet exceeding the minimum IPv6 MTU" (i.e., no more than 1280
        bytes). For ICMPv4, <xref target="RFC0792"/> specifies that the
        packet-in-error includes: "Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data
        Datagram", however <xref target="RFC1812"/> Section 4.3.2.3 updates
        this specification by stating: "the ICMP datagram SHOULD contain as
        much of the original datagram as possible without the length of the
        ICMP datagram exceeding 576 bytes".</t>

        <t>The L2 error message format is shown in <xref
        target="icmp2err"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="icmp2err"
            title="AERO Interface L2 Error Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                               ~
     |        L2 IP Header of        |
     |         error message         |
     ~                               ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         L2 ICMP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
     ~                               ~   P
     |   IP and other encapsulation  |   a
     | headers of original L3 packet |   c
     ~                               ~   k
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   e
     ~                               ~   t
     |        IP header of           |   
     |      original L3 packet       |   i
     ~                               ~   n
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   
     ~                               ~   e
     |    Upper layer headers and    |   r
     |    leading portion of body    |   r
     |   of the original L3 packet   |   o
     ~                               ~   r
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
]]></artwork>
          </figure>The AERO node rules for processing these L2 error messages
        is as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When an AERO node receives an L2 Parameter Problem message, it
            processes the message the same as described as for ordinary ICMP
            errors in the normative references <xref target="RFC0792"/><xref
            target="RFC4443"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent L2 IPv4 Time Exceeded
            messages, the IP ID field may be wrapping before earlier fragments
            have been processed. In that case, the node SHOULD begin including
            integrity checks and/or institute rate limits for subseqent
            packets.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent L2 Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to tunneled packets that it sends
            to one of its dynamic neighbor correspondents, the Client SHOULD
            test the path to the correspondent using Neighbor Unreachability
            Detection (NUD) (see <xref target="nud"/>). If NUD fails, the
            Client SHOULD set ForwardTime for the corresponding dynamic
            neighbor cache entry to 0 and allow future packets destined to the
            correspondent to flow through a Server.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent L2 Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to tunneled packets that it sends
            to one of its static neighbor Servers, the Client SHOULD test the
            path to the Server using NUD. If NUD fails, the Client SHOULD
            delete the neighbor cache entry and attempt to associate with a
            new Server.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Server receives persistent L2 Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to tunneled packets that it sends
            to one of its static neighbor Clients, the Server SHOULD test the
            path to the Client using NUD. If NUD fails, the Server SHOULD
            cancel the DHCPv6 PD for the Client's ACP, withdraw its route for
            the ACP from the AERO routing system and delete the neighbor cache
            entry (see <xref target="nud"/> and <xref target="aeromob"/>).</t>

            <t>When an AERO Relay or Server receives an L2 Destination
            Unreachable message in response to a tunneled packet that it sends
            to one of its permanent neighbors, it discards the message since
            the AERO routing system is likely in a temporary transitional
            state that will soon re-converge. In case of a prolonged outage,
            however, the AERO routing system will compensate for Relays or
            Servers that have fallen silent.</t>
          </list>When an AERO Relay receives an L3 packet for which the
        destination address is covered by an ASP, if there is no more-specific
        routing information for the destination the Relay drops the packet and
        returns an L3 Destination Unreachable message. The Relay first writes
        the IP source address of the original L3 packet as the destination
        address of the L3 Destination Unreachable message and determines the
        next hop to the destination. If the next hop is reached via the AERO
        interface, the Relay uses the IPv6 address "::" or the IPv4 address
        "0.0.0.0" as the IP source address of the L3 Destination Unreachable
        message and forwards the message to the next hop within the AERO
        interface. Otherwise, the Relay uses one of its non link-local
        addresses as the source address of the L3 Destination Unreachable
        message and forwards the message via a link outside the AERO
        interface.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node receives an encapsulated packet for which the
        reassembly buffer it too small, it drops the packet and returns an L3
        Packet To Big (PTB) message. The node first writes the IP source
        address of the original L3 packet as the destination address of the L3
        PTB message and determines the next hop to the destination. If the
        next hop is reached via the AERO interface, the node uses the IPv6
        address "::" or the IPv4 address "0.0.0.0" as the IP source address of
        the L3 PTB message and forwards the message to the next hop within the
        AERO interface. Otherwise, the node uses one of its non link-local
        addresses as the source address of the L3 PTB message and forwards the
        message via a link outside the AERO interface.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node receives any L3 error message via the AERO
        interface, it examines the destination address in the L3 IP header of
        the message. If the next hop toward the destination address of the
        error message is via the AERO interface, the node re-encapsulates and
        forwards the message to the next hop within the AERO interface.
        Otherwise, if the source address in the L3 IP header of the message is
        the IPv6 address "::" or the IPv4 address "0.0.0.0", the node writes
        one of its non link-local addresses as the source address of the L3
        message and recalculates the IP and/or ICMP checksums. The node
        finally forwards the message via a link outside of the AERO
        interface.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd"
               title="AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Address Configuration">
        <t>AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Address Configuration
        are coordinated by the DHCPv6 control messaging protocol as discussed
        in the following Sections.</t>

        <section anchor="aeropd-dhcp" title="AERO DHCPv6 Service Model">
          <t>Each AERO Server configures a DHCPv6 server function to
          facilitate PD requests from Clients. Each Server is provisioned with
          a database of ACP-to-Client ID mappings for all Clients enrolled in
          the AERO system, as well as any information necessary to
          authenticate each Client. The Client database is maintained by a
          central administrative authority for the AERO link and securely
          distributed to all Servers, e.g., via the Lightweight Directory
          Access Protocol (LDAP) <xref target="RFC4511"/> or a similar
          distributed database service.</t>

          <t>Therefore, no Server-to-Server DHCPv6 PD state synchronization is
          necessary, and Clients can optionally hold separate PDs for the same
          ACPs from multiple Servers. In this way, Clients can associate with
          multiple Servers, and can receive new PDs from new Servers before
          deprecating PDs received from existing Servers. This provides the
          Client with a natural fault-tolerance and/or load balancing
          profile.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Servers exchange configuration information using
          an AERO Vendor-Specific Information Option (AVSIO) formatted as
          follows:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="vsopt"
              title="AERO Vendor-Specific Information Option (AVSIO)">
              <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS       |            option-len         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                   enterprise-number = 45282                   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     .                                                               .
     .                          option-data                          .
     .                                                               .
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+]]></artwork>
            </figure>In this format, "enterprise-number" is set to 45282
          (i.e., the IANA-reserved enterprise number for AERO) and
          "option-length" is set to the total length of the option. A single
          AVSIO may include one or more AERO-specific (sub)options as defined
          in the following sections.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients MUST include an AVSIO in DHCPv6 Solicit and Rebind
          messages to manage the Server's cached link-layer addresses and
          preferences. AERO Servers MUST include an AVSIO in DHCPv6 Reply
          messages that correspond to a Client's DHCPv6 message that also
          included an AVSIO option.</t>

          <t>The following sections specify the Client and Server behavior in
          more detail.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-client" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>AERO Clients discover the link-layer addresses of AERO Servers
          via static configuration (e.g., from a flat-file map of Server
          addresses and locations), or through an automated means such as DNS
          name resolution. In the absence of other information, the Client
          resolves the FQDN "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" where
          "linkupnetworks" is a constant text string and "[domainname]" is a
          DNS suffix for the Client's underlying network (e.g.,
          "example.com"). After discovering the link-layer addresses, the
          Client associates with one or more of the corresponding Servers.</t>

          <t>To associate with a Server, the Client acts as a requesting
          router to request ACPs through a two-message (i.e., Solicit/Reply)
          DHCPv6 PD exchange <xref target="RFC3315"/><xref target="RFC3633"/>.
          The Client's includes fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff as the IPv6 source
          address of the Solicit message, 'All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers'
          as the IPv6 destination address, an underlying interface address of
          the Client (i.e., the link-layer address) as the link-layer source
          address and the link-layer address of the Server as the link-layer
          destination address. The Client also includes a Rapid Commit option,
          a Client Identifier option with the Client's DUID, and an Identity
          Association for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD) option. If the Client is
          pre-provisioned with ACPs associated with the AERO service, it MAY
          also include the ACPs in the IA_PD to indicate its preferences to
          the DHCPv6 server.</t>

          <t>The Client also includes an AVSIO option with one or more AERO
          Client Link-Layer Address Options (ACLLAOs) to register its
          link-layer address(es) with the Server. The first ACLLAO MUST be
          specific to the underlying interface over which the Client will send
          the Solicit. The Client MAY include additonal ACLLAOs specific to
          other underlying interfaces, but if so it MUST have assurance that
          there will be no NATs on the paths to the Server via those
          interfaces. (Otherwise, the Client MAY issue subsequent Rebind
          messages after the initial Solicit/Reply exchange to register
          additional link-layer addresses). The Server will echo the ACLLAOs
          in the corresponding Reply message as specified in <xref
          target="aeropd-server"/>.</t>

          <t>The format for the ACLLAO is shown in <xref
          target="alireq"/>:<figure anchor="alireq"
              title="AERO Client Link-Layer Address Option (ACLLAO)">
              <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | opt-code = OPTION_ACLLAO (0)  |           option-len          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     .                                                               .
     .                 AERO Client Link-Layer Address                .
     .                                                               .
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t>In the above format, the Client sets 'opt-code' to 0
          ("OPTION_ACLLAO") and sets 'option-len' to 36 (i.e., the length of
          the option following this field). The Client then includes an "AERO
          Client Link-Layer Address" in the same format as for S/TLLAOs in
          <xref target="llaov6"/> beginning with the 'Reserved2' field and
          extending to the end of the S/TLLAO. The Client then sets
          'Reserved2', 'Interface ID', 'UDP Port Number', 'IP address' and
          'P(i)' values for the specific underlying interface the same as for
          S/TLLAO options (see <xref target="interface"/>). The Client finally
          includes any additional DHCPv6 options (including any necessary
          authentication options to identify itself to the DHCPv6 server), and
          sends the encapsulated Solicit message via the underlying interface
          corresponding to the Interface ID of the first ACLLAO.</t>

          <t>When the Client attempts to perform a DHCPv6 PD exchange with a
          Server that is too busy to service the request, the Client may
          receive an error status code such as "NoPrefixAvail" in the Server's
          Reply <xref target="RFC3633"/> or no Reply at all. In that case, the
          Client SHOULD discontinue DHCPv6 PD attempts through this Server and
          try another Server.</t>

          <t>When the Client receives a Reply from the AERO Server with an
          AVSIO option and no error status codes, it can compare the UDP Port
          Number and IP Address values in the first ACLLAO with the values the
          Client provided in its request. If the values are different, the
          Client can infer that there is a NAT on the path to the Server via
          that underlying interface. If the AVSIO option also includes an
          ALINFO sub-option, the Client also assigns the MTU/MFU values in the
          ALINFO option to its AERO interface, then caches any ASPs included
          in the ALINFO option as ASPs to associate with the AERO link (see
          <xref target="aeropd-server"/>). This configuration information
          applies to the AERO link as a whole, and all Clients will receive
          the same information.</t>

          <t>The Client next creates a static neighbor cache entry with the
          Server's link-local address as the network-layer address and the
          Server's encapsulation address as the link-layer address. Next, the
          Client autoconfigures an AERO address for each of the delegated
          ACPs, assigns the address(es) to the AERO interface and
          sub-delegates the ACPs to its attached EUNs and/or the Client's own
          internal virtual interfaces. The Client can then configure as many
          addresses as it wants from /64 prefixes taken from the ACPs and
          assign them to either an internal virtual interface ("weak
          end-system") or to the AERO interface itself ("strong end-system")
          <xref target="RFC1122"/> while black-holing the remaining portions
          of the /64s. Finally, the Client assigns a default IP route to the
          AERO interface with the link-local address of the Server as the next
          hop and with the PD lifetime as the default router lifetime.</t>

          <t>After the initial Solicit/Reply exchange, the Client SHOULD begin
          using the AERO address as the source address for further DHCPv6
          messaging. The Client subsequently renews its ACP delegations
          through each of its Servers by sending Renew messages with the
          link-layer address of a Server as the link-layer destination
          address. The Client MAY subsequently issue Rebind messages with
          additional ACLLAOs if it wishes to register additional Interface IDs
          and/or update the link-layer address information for existing
          Interface IDs. In that case, the Rebind message MUST be sent over
          the underlying interface corresponding to the first ACLLAO in the
          message, i.e., the same as for Solicits.</t>

          <t>After an AERO Client registers its Interface IDs and their
          associated 'P(i)' values with the AERO Server, the Client may wish
          to change one or more Interface ID registrations, e.g., if an
          underlying interface becomes unavailable, if cost profiles change,
          etc. To do so, the Client prepares a Rebind message to send over any
          available underlying interface. The Rebind MUST include the ACLLAO
          specific to the selected avaialble underlying interface as the first
          ACLLAO and MAY include any additional ACLLAOs specific to other
          underlying interfaces. The Client includes fresh 'P(i)' values in
          each ACLLAO to update the Server's neighbor cache entry. If the
          Client wishes to disable some or all DSCPs for an underlying
          interface, it includes an ACLLAO with 'P(i)' values set to 0
          ("disabled").</t>

          <t>If the Client wishes to discontinue use of a Server it issues a
          Release to delete the Server's neighbor cache entry.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-server" title="AERO Server Behavior">
          <t>AERO Servers configure a DHCPv6 server function on their AERO
          links. AERO Servers arrange to add their encapsulation layer IP
          addresses (i.e., their link-layer addresses) to a static map of
          Server addresses for the link and/or the DNS resource records for
          the FQDN "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" before entering service.</t>

          <t>When an AERO Server receives a prospective Client's Solicit on
          its AERO interface, and the Server is too busy to service the
          message, it SHOULD return a Reply with status code "NoPrefixAvail"
          per <xref target="RFC3633"/>. Otherwise, the Server authenticates
          the message. If authentication succeeds, the Server determines the
          correct ACPs to delegate to the Client by searching the Client
          database.</t>

          <t>When the Server delegates the ACPs, it also creates IP forwarding
          table entries so that the AERO BGP-based routing system will
          propagate the ACPs to all Relays that aggregate the corresponding
          ASP (see: <xref target="scaling"/>). Next, the Server prepares a
          Reply message to send to the Client while using fe80::ID as the IPv6
          source address, the link-local address taken from the Client's
          Solicit as the IPv6 destination address, the Server's link-layer
          address as the source link-layer address, and the Client's
          link-layer address as the destination link-layer address. The Server
          also includes IA_PD options with the delegated ACPs. For IPv4 ACPs,
          the prefix included in the IA_PD option is in IPv4-mapped IPv6
          address format and with prefix length set as specified in <xref
          target="aero-address"/>. For AERO links where a Client may
          experience a fault that prevents it from issuing a Release before
          departing from the network, Servers should set a short prefix
          lifetime (e.g., 40 seconds) so that stale PD state can be flushed
          out of the network.</t>

          <t>For Replies to Client DHCPv6 messages that include an AVSIO, the
          Server prepares a new AVSIO to include in the Reply. The Server
          first copies the ACLLAOs in the body of the Client's AVSIO into the
          AVSIO that the Server will supply in the Reply message. For the
          initial ACLLAO, the Server sets 'UDP Port Number' and 'IP address'
          to the values observed in the outer encapsulating headers of the
          Client's DHCPv6 message, i.e., even if these values are different
          than the ones included by the Client.</t>

          <t>The Server next copies an ALINFO option into the body of the
          AVSIO (i.e., following the ACLLAO options) formatted as shown in
          <xref target="alinfo"/>:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="alinfo"
              title="AERO Link Information (ALINFO) Option">
              <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  opt-code = OPTION_ALINFO (1) |           option-len          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)|   Maximum Fragment Unit (MFU) |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Prefix Len #1 |  AERO Service Prefix (ASP) #1 (1 to 8 bytes)  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Prefix Len #2 |  AERO Service Prefix (ASP) #2 (1 to 8 bytes)  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Prefix Len #3 |  AERO Service Prefix (ASP) #3 (1 to 8 bytes)  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                                                               ~
     ~                                                               ~

]]></artwork>
            </figure>In the ALINFO option, the Server sets sets 'opt-code' to
          1 ("OPTION_ALINFO") and sets 'option-len' to the length of the
          remainder of the option. The Server next sets MTU and MFU according
          to the considerations specified in <xref target="aeromtu"/>. The
          Server finally includes one or more ASPs with 'Prefix Len' set to
          the ASP prefix length (between 0 and 64), and 'AERO Service Prefix'
          set to the ASP (between 1 and 8 bytes).</t>

          <t>When the Server sends the Reply message, it creates or updates a
          static neighbor cache entry for the Client based on the DUID and
          AERO addresses with lifetime set to no more than the PD lifetimes
          and updates the Client's link-layer addresses according to the
          ACLLAOs. The Server then uses the Client link-layer addresses as the
          link-layer addresses for encapsulation and uses the 'P(i)' values
          included in ACLLAOs as preference levels for each DSCP value.</t>

          <t>After the initial DHCPv6 PD Solicit/Reply exchange, the AERO
          Server maintains the neighbor cache entry for the Client until the
          PD lifetimes expire. If the Client issues a Rebind, the Server uses
          any included ACLLAOs to update the link-layer information in the
          Client's neighbor cache entry. If the Client issues a Renew, the
          Server extends the PD lifetimes. If the Client issues a Release, or
          if the Client does not issue a Renew before the lifetime expires,
          the Server deletes the neighbor cache entry for the Client and
          withdraws the IP routes from the AERO routing system.</t>

          <section title="Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA)">
            <t>AERO Clients and Servers are always on the same link (i.e., the
            AERO link) from the perspective of DHCPv6. However, in some
            implementations the DHCPv6 server and AERO interface driver may be
            located in separate modules. In that case, the Server's AERO
            interface driver module can act as a Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay
            Agent (LDRA)<xref target="RFC6221"> </xref> to relay DHCPv6
            messages to and from the DHCPv6 server module.</t>

            <t>When the LDRA receives a DHCPv6 message from a client, it
            prepares an AVSIO (including any ACLLAO and ALINFO options as
            described above) and copies the option into a DHCPv6
            Relay-Supplied Option Option (RSOO) <xref target="RFC6422"/>. The
            LDRA then incorporates the RSOO into the Relay-Forward message and
            forwards the message to the DHCPv6 server.</t>

            <t>When the DHCPv6 server receives the Relay-Forward message, it
            caches the AVSIO included in the RSOO and discards the AVSIO
            included within the Client's message itself. Next, the server
            authenticates the Client's message and prepares a Reply message if
            authentication succeeds.</t>

            <t>When the DHCPv6 server prepares a Reply message, it then
            includes the relay-supplied AVSIO in the body of the message along
            with any other options, then wraps the message in a Relay-Reply
            message. The DHCPv6 server then delivers the Relay-Reply message
            to the LDRA, which discards the Relay-Reply wrapper and delivers
            the DHCPv6 message to the Client.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd-agent" title="AERO Forwarding Agent Behavior">
        <t>AERO Servers MAY associate with one or more companion AERO
        Forwarding Agents as platforms for offloading high-speed data plane
        traffic. When an AERO Server receives a Client's
        Solicit/Renew/Rebind/Release message, it services the message then
        forwards the corresponding Reply message to the Forwarding Agent. When
        the Forwarding Agent receives the Reply message, it creates, updates
        or deletes a neighbor cache entry with the Client's AERO address and
        link-layer information included in the Reply message. The Forwarding
        Agent then forwards the Reply message back to the AERO Server, which
        forwards the message to the Client. In this way, Forwarding Agent
        state is managed in conjunction with Server state, with the Client
        responsible for reliability.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Server receives a data packet on an AERO interface
        with a network layer destination address for which it has distributed
        forwarding information to a Forwarding Agent, the Server returns a
        Redirect message to the source neighbor (subject to rate limiting)
        then forwards the data packet as usual. The Redirect message includes
        a TLLAO with the link-layer address of the Forwarding Engine.</t>

        <t>When the source neighbor receives the Redirect message, it SHOULD
        record the link-layer address in the TLLAO as the encapsulation
        addresses to use for sending subsequent data packets. However, the
        source MUST continue to use the primary link-layer address of the
        Server as the encapsulation address for sending control messages.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="predirect" title="AERO Link Route Optimization">
        <t>When a source Client forwards packets to a prospective
        correspondent Client within the same AERO link domain (i.e., one for
        which the packet's destination address is covered by an ASP), the
        source Client MAY initiate an AERO link route optimization procedure.
        It is important to note that this procedure is initiated by the
        Client; if the procedure were initiated by the Server, the Server
        would have no way of knowing whether the Client was actually able to
        contact the correspondent over the route-optimized path.</t>

        <t>The procedure is based on an exchange of IPv6 ND messages using a
        chain of AERO Servers and Relays as a trust basis. This procedure is
        in contrast to the Return Routability procedure required for route
        optimization to a correspondent Client located in the Internet as
        described in <xref target="aerointernet"/>. The following sections
        specify the AERO link route optimization procedure.</t>

        <section anchor="avoidance-fig" title="Reference Operational Scenario">
          <t><xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/> depicts the AERO link route
          optimization reference operational scenario, using IPv6 addressing
          as the example (while not shown, a corresponding example for IPv4
          addressing can be easily constructed). The figure shows an AERO
          Relay ('R1'), two AERO Servers ('S1', 'S2'), two AERO Clients ('C1',
          'C2') and two ordinary IPv6 hosts ('H1', 'H2'):</t>

          <figure anchor="no-onlink-prefix-fig"
                  title="AERO Reference Operational Scenario">
            <artwork><![CDATA[         +--------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+
         |   Server S1  |  |    Relay R1  |  |   Server S2  |
         +--------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+
             fe80::2            fe80::1           fe80::3
              L2(S1)             L2(R1)            L2(S2) 
                |                  |                 |
    X-----+-----+------------------+-----------------+----+----X
          |       AERO Link                               |
         L2(A)                                          L2(B)
  fe80::2001:db8:0:0                              fe80::2001:db8:1:0
  +--------------+                                 +--------------+
  |AERO Client C1|                                 |AERO Client C2|
  +--------------+                                 +--------------+
  2001:DB8:0::/48                                  2001:DB8:1::/48
          |                                                |
         .-.                                              .-.
      ,-(  _)-.   2001:db8:0::1      2001:db8:1::1     ,-(  _)-.
   .-(_  IP   )-.   +---------+      +---------+    .-(_  IP   )-.
 (__    EUN      )--| Host H1 |      | Host H2 |--(__    EUN      )
    `-(______)-'    +---------+      +---------+     `-(______)-'
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t>In <xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/>, Relay ('R1') assigns
          the address fe80::1 to its AERO interface with link-layer address
          L2(R1), Server ('S1') assigns the address fe80::2 with link-layer
          address L2(S1),and Server ('S2') assigns the address fe80::3 with
          link-layer address L2(S2). Servers ('S1') and ('S2') next arrange to
          add their link-layer addresses to a published list of valid Servers
          for the AERO link.</t>

          <t>AERO Client ('C1') receives the ACP 2001:db8:0::/48 in a DHCPv6
          PD exchange via AERO Server ('S1') then assigns the address
          fe80::2001:db8:0:0 to its AERO interface with link-layer address
          L2(C1). Client ('C1') configures a default route and neighbor cache
          entry via the AERO interface with next-hop address fe80::2 and
          link-layer address L2(S1), then sub-delegates the ACP to its
          attached EUNs. IPv6 host ('H1') connects to the EUN, and configures
          the address 2001:db8:0::1.</t>

          <t>AERO Client ('C2') receives the ACP 2001:db8:1::/48 in a DHCPv6
          PD exchange via AERO Server ('S2') then assigns the address
          fe80::2001:db8:1:0 to its AERO interface with link-layer address
          L2(C2). Client ('C2') configures a default route and neighbor cache
          entry via the AERO interface with next-hop address fe80::3 and
          link-layer address L2(S2), then sub-delegates the ACP to its
          attached EUNs. IPv6 host ('H2') connects to the EUN, and configures
          the address 2001:db8:1::1.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="conops" title="Concept of Operations">
          <t>Again, with reference to <xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/>,
          when source host ('H1') sends a packet to destination host ('H2'),
          the packet is first forwarded over the source host's attached EUN to
          Client ('C1'). Client ('C1') then forwards the packet via its AERO
          interface to Server ('S1') and also sends a Predirect message toward
          Client ('C2') via Server ('S1'). Server ('S1') then re-encapsulates
          and forwards both the packet and the Predirect message out the same
          AERO interface toward Client ('C2') via Relay ('R1').</t>

          <t>When Relay ('R1') receives the packet and Predirect message, it
          consults its forwarding table to discover Server ('S2') as the next
          hop toward Client ('C2'). Relay ('R1') then forwards both the packet
          and the Predirect message to Server ('S2'), which then forwards them
          to Client ('C2').</t>

          <t>After Client ('C2') receives the Predirect message, it process
          the message and returns a Redirect message toward Client ('C1') via
          Server ('S2'). During the process, Client ('C2') also creates or
          updates a dynamic neighbor cache entry for Client ('C1').</t>

          <t>When Server ('S2') receives the Redirect message, it
          re-encapsulates the message and forwards it on to Relay ('R1'),
          which forwards the message on to Server ('S1') which forwards the
          message on to Client ('C1'). After Client ('C1') receives the
          Redirect message, it processes the message and creates or updates a
          dynamic neighbor cache entry for Client ('C2').</t>

          <t>Following the above Predirect/Redirect message exchange,
          forwarding of packets from Client ('C1') to Client ('C2') without
          involving any intermediate nodes is enabled. The mechanisms that
          support this exchange are specified in the following sections.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmsg" title="Message Format">
          <t>AERO Redirect/Predirect messages use the same format as for IPv6
          ND Redirect messages depicted in Section 4.5 of <xref
          target="RFC4861"/>, but also include a new "Prefix Length" field
          taken from the low-order 8 bits of the Redirect message Reserved
          field. For IPv6, valid values for the Prefix Length field are 0
          through 64; for IPv4, valid values are 0 through 32. The
          Redirect/Predirect messages are formatted as shown in <xref
          target="aero-redirect"/>:</t>

          <figure anchor="aero-redirect"
                  title="AERO Redirect/Predirect Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Type (=137)  |  Code (=0/1)  |          Checksum             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Reserved                    | Prefix Length |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +                       Target Address                          +
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +                     Destination Address                       +
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Options ...
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t/>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sending_pre" title="Sending Predirects">
          <t>When a Client forwards a packet with a source address from one of
          its ACPs toward a destination address covered by an ASP (i.e.,
          toward another AERO Client connected to the same AERO link), the
          source Client MAY send a Predirect message forward toward the
          destination Client via the Server.</t>

          <t>In the reference operational scenario, when Client ('C1')
          forwards a packet toward Client ('C2'), it MAY also send a Predirect
          message forward toward Client ('C2'), subject to rate limiting (see
          Section 8.2 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>). Client ('C1') prepares the
          Predirect message as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the link-layer source address is set to 'L2(C1)' (i.e., the
              link-layer address of Client ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the link-layer destination address is set to 'L2(S1)' (i.e.,
              the link-layer address of Server ('S1')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer source address is set to fe80::2001:db8:0:0
              (i.e., the AERO address of Client ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer destination address is set to
              fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the AERO address of Client
              ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the Type is set to 137.</t>

              <t>the Code is set to 1 to indicate "Predirect".</t>

              <t>the Prefix Length is set to the length of the prefix to be
              assigned to the Target Address.</t>

              <t>the Target Address is set to fe80::2001:db8:0:0 (i.e., the
              AERO address of Client ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the Destination Address is set to the source address of the
              originating packet that triggered the Predirection event. (If
              the originating packet is an IPv4 packet, the address is
              constructed in IPv4-mapped IPv6 address format).</t>

              <t>the message includes one or more TLLAOs set to appropriate
              values for Client ('C1')'s underlying interfaces, and with UDP
              Port Number and IP Address set to 0'.</t>

              <t>the message SHOULD include a Timestamp option and a Nonce
              option.</t>

              <t>the message includes a Redirected Header Option (RHO) that
              contains the originating packet truncated if necessary to ensure
              that at least the network-layer header is included but the size
              of the message does not exceed 1280 bytes.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>Note that the act of sending Predirect messages is cited as
          "MAY", since Client ('C1') may have advanced knowledge that the
          direct path to Client ('C2') would be unusable or otherwise
          undesirable. If the direct path later becomes unusable after the
          initial route optimization, Client ('C1') simply allows packets to
          again flow through Server ('S1').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relaying_pre"
                 title="Re-encapsulating and Relaying Predirects">
          <t>When Server ('S1') receives a Predirect message from Client
          ('C1'), it first verifies that the TLLAOs in the Predirect are a
          proper subset of the Interface IDs in Client ('C1')'s neighbor cache
          entry. If the Client's TLLAOs are not acceptable, Server ('S1')
          discards the message. Otherwise, Server ('S1') validates the message
          according to the Redirect message validation rules in Section 8.1 of
          <xref target="RFC4861"/>, except that the Predirect has Code=1.
          Server ('S1') also verifies that Client ('C1') is authorized to use
          the Prefix Length in the Predirect when applied to the AERO address
          in the network-layer source address by searching for the AERO
          address in the neighbor cache. If validation fails, Server ('S1')
          discards the Predirect; otherwise, it copies the correct UDP Port
          numbers and IP Addresses for Client ('C1')'s links into the
          (previously empty) TLLAOs.</t>

          <t>Server ('S1') then examines the network-layer destination address
          of the Predirect to determine the next hop toward Client ('C2') by
          searching for the AERO address in the neighbor cache. Since Client
          ('C2') is not one of its neighbors, Server ('S1') re-encapsulates
          the Predirect and relays it via Relay ('R1') by changing the
          link-layer source address of the message to 'L2(S1)' and changing
          the link-layer destination address to 'L2(R1)'. Server ('S1')
          finally forwards the re-encapsulated message to Relay ('R1') without
          decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>

          <t>When Relay ('R1') receives the Predirect message from Server
          ('S1') it determines that Server ('S2') is the next hop toward
          Client ('C2') by consulting its forwarding table. Relay ('R1') then
          re-encapsulates the Predirect while changing the link-layer source
          address to 'L2(R1)' and changing the link-layer destination address
          to 'L2(S2)'. Relay ('R1') then relays the Predirect via Server
          ('S2').</t>

          <t>When Server ('S2') receives the Predirect message from Relay
          ('R1') it determines that Client ('C2') is a neighbor by consulting
          its neighbor cache. Server ('S2') then re-encapsulates the Predirect
          while changing the link-layer source address to 'L2(S2)' and
          changing the link-layer destination address to 'L2(C2)'. Server
          ('S2') then forwards the message to Client ('C2').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="processing_pre"
                 title="Processing Predirects and Sending Redirects">
          <t>When Client ('C2') receives the Predirect message, it accepts the
          Predirect only if the message has a link-layer source address of one
          of its Servers (e.g., L2(S2)). Client ('C2') further accepts the
          message only if it is willing to serve as a redirection target.
          Next, Client ('C2') validates the message according to the Redirect
          message validation rules in Section 8.1 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>,
          except that it accepts the message even though Code=1 and even
          though the network-layer source address is not that of it's current
          first-hop router.</t>

          <t>In the reference operational scenario, when Client ('C2')
          receives a valid Predirect message, it either creates or updates a
          dynamic neighbor cache entry that stores the Target Address of the
          message as the network-layer address of Client ('C1') , stores the
          link-layer addresses found in the TLLAOs as the link-layer addresses
          of Client ('C1') and stores the Prefix Length as the length to be
          applied to the network-layer address for forwarding purposes. Client
          ('C2') then sets AcceptTime for the neighbor cache entry to
          ACCEPT_TIME.</t>

          <t>After processing the message, Client ('C2') prepares a Redirect
          message response as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the link-layer source address is set to 'L2(C2)' (i.e., the
              link-layer address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the link-layer destination address is set to 'L2(S2)' (i.e.,
              the link-layer address of Server ('S2')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer source address is set to fe80::2001:db8:1:0
              (i.e., the AERO address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer destination address is set to
              fe80::2001:db8:0:0 (i.e., the AERO address of Client
              ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the Type is set to 137.</t>

              <t>the Code is set to 0 to indicate "Redirect".</t>

              <t>the Prefix Length is set to the length of the prefix to be
              applied to the Target Address.</t>

              <t>the Target Address is set to fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the
              AERO address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the Destination Address is set to the destination address of
              the originating packet that triggered the Redirection event. (If
              the originating packet is an IPv4 packet, the address is
              constructed in IPv4-mapped IPv6 address format).</t>

              <t>the message includes one or more TLLAOs set to appropriate
              values for Client ('C2')'s underlying interfaces, and with UDP
              Port Number and IP Address set to '0'.</t>

              <t>the message SHOULD include a Timestamp option and MUST echo
              the Nonce option received in the Predirect (i.e., if a Nonce
              option is included).</t>

              <t>the message includes as much of the RHO copied from the
              corresponding Predirect message as possible such that at least
              the network-layer header is included but the size of the message
              does not exceed 1280 bytes.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>After Client ('C2') prepares the Redirect message, it sends the
          message to Server ('S2').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relaying_re"
                 title="Re-encapsulating and Relaying Redirects">
          <t>When Server ('S2') receives a Redirect message from Client
          ('C2'), it first verifies that the TLLAOs in the Redirect are a
          proper subset of the Interface IDs in Client ('C2')'s neighbor cache
          entry. If the Client's TLLAOs are not acceptable, Server ('S2')
          discards the message. Otherwise, Server ('S2') validates the message
          according to the Redirect message validation rules in Section 8.1 of
          <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Server ('S2') also verifies that Client
          ('C2') is authorized to use the Prefix Length in the Redirect when
          applied to the AERO address in the network-layer source address by
          searching for the AERO address in the neighbor cache. If validation
          fails, Server ('S2') discards the Redirect; otherwise, it copies the
          correct UDP Port numbers and IP Addresses for Client ('C2')'s links
          into the (previously empty) TLLAOs.</t>

          <t>Server ('S2') then examines the network-layer destination address
          of the Redirect to determine the next hop toward Client ('C1') by
          searching for the AERO address in the neighbor cache. Since Client
          ('C1') is not a neighbor, Server ('S2') re-encapsulates the Redirect
          and relays it via Relay ('R1') by changing the link-layer source
          address of the message to 'L2(S2)' and changing the link-layer
          destination address to 'L2(R1)'. Server ('S2') finally forwards the
          re-encapsulated message to Relay ('R1') without decrementing the
          network-layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>

          <t>When Relay ('R1') receives the Redirect message from Server
          ('S2') it determines that Server ('S1') is the next hop toward
          Client ('C1') by consulting its forwarding table. Relay ('R1') then
          re-encapsulates the Redirect while changing the link-layer source
          address to 'L2(R1)' and changing the link-layer destination address
          to 'L2(S1)'. Relay ('R1') then relays the Redirect via Server
          ('S1').</t>

          <t>When Server ('S1') receives the Redirect message from Relay
          ('R1') it determines that Client ('C1') is a neighbor by consulting
          its neighbor cache. Server ('S1') then re-encapsulates the Redirect
          while changing the link-layer source address to 'L2(S1)' and
          changing the link-layer destination address to 'L2(C1)'. Server
          ('S1') then forwards the message to Client ('C1').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="processing_re" title="Processing Redirects">
          <t>When Client ('C1') receives the Redirect message, it accepts the
          message only if it has a link-layer source address of one of its
          Servers (e.g., ''L2(S1)'). Next, Client ('C1') validates the message
          according to the Redirect message validation rules in Section 8.1 of
          <xref target="RFC4861"/>, except that it accepts the message even
          though the network-layer source address is not that of it's current
          first-hop router. Following validation, Client ('C1') then processes
          the message as follows.</t>

          <t>In the reference operational scenario, when Client ('C1')
          receives the Redirect message, it either creates or updates a
          dynamic neighbor cache entry that stores the Target Address of the
          message as the network-layer address of Client ('C2'), stores the
          link-layer addresses found in the TLLAOs as the link-layer addresses
          of Client ('C2') and stores the Prefix Length as the length to be
          applied to the network-layer address for forwarding purposes. Client
          ('C1') then sets ForwardTime for the neighbor cache entry to
          FORWARD_TIME.</t>

          <t>Now, Client ('C1') has a neighbor cache entry with a valid
          ForwardTime value, while Client ('C2') has a neighbor cache entry
          with a valid AcceptTime value. Thereafter, Client ('C1') may forward
          ordinary network-layer data packets directly to Client ('C2')
          without involving any intermediate nodes, and Client ('C2') can
          verify that the packets came from an acceptable source. (In order
          for Client ('C2') to forward packets to Client ('C1'), a
          corresponding Predirect/Redirect message exchange is required in the
          reverse direction; hence, the mechanism is asymmetric.)</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="server_re" title="Server-Oriented Redirection">
          <t>In some environments, the Server nearest the target Client may
          need to serve as the redirection target, e.g., if direct
          Client-to-Client communications are not possible. In that case, the
          Server prepares the Redirect message the same as if it were the
          destination Client (see: <xref target="processing_pre"/>), except
          that it writes its own link-layer address in the TLLAO option. The
          Server must then maintain a dynamic neighbor cache entry for the
          redirected source Client.</t>
        </section>

        <section title="Route Optimization Policy">
          <t>Although the Client is responsible for initiating route
          optimization through the transmission of Predirect messages, the
          Server is the policy enforcement point that determines whether route
          optimization is permitted. For example, on some AERO links route
          optimization would allow traffic to circumvent critical
          network-based traffic interception points. In those cases, the
          Server can deny route optimization requests by simply discarding any
          Predirect messages instead of forwarding them.</t>
        </section>

        <section title="Route Optimization and Multiple ACPs">
          <t>Clients that receive multiple non-contiguous ACP delegations must
          perform route optimization for each of the individual ACPs based on
          demand of traffic with source addresses taken from those prefixes.
          For example, if Client C1 has already performed route optimization
          for destination ACP X on behalf of its source ACP Y, it must also
          perform route optimization for X on behalf of its source ACP Z. As a
          result, source route optimization state cannot be shared between
          non-contiguous ACPs and must be managed separately.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nud" title="Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD)">
        <t>AERO nodes perform Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) by
        sending unicast NS messages to elicit solicited NA messages from
        neighbors the same as described in <xref target="RFC4861"/>. NUD is
        performed either reactively in response to persistent L2 errors (see
        <xref target="aeroerr"/>) or proactively to test existing neighbor
        cache entries.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node sends an NS/NA message, it MUST use its
        link-local address as the IPv6 source address and the link-local
        address of the neighbor as the IPv6 destination address. When an AERO
        node receives an NS message or a solicited NA message, it accepts the
        message if it has a neighbor cache entry for the neighbor; otherwise,
        it ignores the message.</t>

        <t>When a source Client is redirected to a target Client it SHOULD
        proactively test the direct path by sending an initial NS message to
        elicit a solicited NA response. While testing the path, the source
        Client can optionally continue sending packets via the Server,
        maintain a small queue of packets until target reachability is
        confirmed, or (optimistically) allow packets to flow directly to the
        target. The source Client SHOULD thereafter continue to test the
        direct path to the target Client (see Section 7.3 of <xref
        target="RFC4861"/>) periodically in order to keep dynamic neighbor
        cache entries alive.</t>

        <t>In particular, while the source Client is actively sending packets
        to the target Client it SHOULD also send NS messages separated by
        RETRANS_TIMER milliseconds in order to receive solicited NA messages.
        If the source Client is unable to elicit a solicited NA response from
        the target Client after MAX_RETRY attempts, it SHOULD set ForwardTime
        to 0 and resume sending packets via one of its Servers. Otherwise, the
        source Client considers the path usable and SHOULD thereafter process
        any link-layer errors as a hint that the direct path to the target
        Client has either failed or has become intermittent.</t>

        <t>When ForwardTime for a dynamic neighbor cache entry expires, the
        source Client resumes sending any subsequent packets via a Server and
        may (eventually) attempt to re-initiate the AERO redirection process.
        When AcceptTime for a dynamic neighbor cache entry expires, the target
        Client discards any subsequent packets received directly from the
        source Client. When both ForwardTime and AcceptTime for a dynamic
        neighbor cache entry expire, the Client deletes the neighbor cache
        entry.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromob" title="Mobility Management">
        <section anchor="llchange"
                 title="Announcing Link-Layer Address Changes">
          <t>When a Client needs to change its link-layer address, e.g., due
          to a mobility event, it issues an immediate Rebind to each of its
          Servers using the new link-layer address as the source address and
          with an ACLLAO that includes the updated client link-layer
          information. If authentication succeeds, the Server then updates its
          neighbor cache and sends a Reply. Note that if the Client does not
          issue a Rebind before the PD lifetime expires (e.g., if the Client
          has been out of touch with the Server for a considerable amount of
          time), the Server's Reply will report NoBinding and the Client must
          re-initiate the DHCPv6 PD procedure.</t>

          <t>Next, the Client sends Predirect messages to each of its
          correspondent Client neighbors using the same procedures as
          specified in <xref target="sending_pre"/>. The Client sends the
          Predirect messages via a Server the same as if it was performing the
          initial route optimization procedure with the correspondent. The
          Predirect message will update the correspondent's link layer address
          mapping for the Client.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newlink" title="Bringing New Links Into Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to bring a new underlying interface into
          service (e.g., when it activates a new data link), it issues an
          immediate Rebind to each of its Servers using the new link-layer
          address as the source address and with an ACLLAO that includes the
          new client link-layer information. If authentication succeeds, the
          Server then updates its neighbor cache and sends a Reply. The Client
          MAY then send Predirect messages to each of its correspondent
          Clients to inform them of the new link-layer address as described in
          <xref target="llchange"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmlink" title="Removing Existing Links from Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to remove an existing underlying interface
          from service (e.g., when it de-activates an existing data link), it
          issues an immediate Rebind to each of its Servers over any available
          link with an ACLLAO that includes P(i) values set to "disabled". If
          authentication succeeds, the Server then updates its neighbor cache
          and sends a Reply. The Client SHOULD then send Predirect messages to
          each of its correspondent Clients to inform them of the deprecated
          link-layer address as described in <xref target="llchange"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="imcplicit" title="Implicit Mobility Management">
          <t>AERO Clients and Servers MAY include a configuration knob that
          allows them to perform implicit mobility management in which no
          DHCPv6 messaging is used. In that case, the Client only transmits
          packets over a single interface at a time, and the Server always
          observes packets arriving from the Client from the same link-layer
          source address.</t>

          <t>If the Client's underlying interface address changes (either due
          to a readdressing of the original interface or switching to a new
          interface) the Server immediately updates the neighbor cache entry
          for the Client and begins accepting and sending packets to the
          Client's new link-layer address. This implicit mobility method
          applies to use cases such as cellphones with both WiFi and Cellular
          interfaces where only one of the interfaces is active at a given
          time, and the Client automatically switches over to the backup
          interface if the primary interface fails.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newsrv" title="Moving to a New Server">
          <t>When a Client associates with a new Server, it performs the
          Client procedures specified in <xref target="aeropd-client"/>.</t>

          <t>When a Client disassociates with an existing Server, it sends a
          Release message via a new Server to the unicast link-local network
          layer address of the old Server. The new Server then writes its own
          link-layer address in the Release message IP source address and
          forwards the message to the old Server.</t>

          <t>When the old Server receives the Release, it first authenticates
          the message. Next, it resets the Client's neighbor cache entry
          lifetime to 3 seconds, rewrites the link-layer address in the
          neighbor cache entry to the address of the new Server, then returns
          a Reply message to the Client via the old Server. When the lifetime
          expires, the old Server withdraws the IP route from the AERO routing
          system and deletes the neighbor cache entry for the Client. The
          Client can then use the Reply message to verify that the termination
          signal has been processed, and can delete both the default route and
          the neighbor cache entry for the old Server. (Note that since
          Release/Reply messages may be lost in the network the Client SHOULD
          retry until it gets a Reply indicating that the Release was
          successful. If the Client does not receive a Reply after MAX_RETRY
          attempts, the old Server may have failed and the Client should
          discontinue its Release attempts.)</t>

          <t>Clients SHOULD NOT move rapidly between Servers in order to avoid
          causing excessive oscillations in the AERO routing system. Such
          oscillations could result in intermittent reachability for the
          Client itself, while causing little harm to the network. Examples of
          when a Client might wish to change to a different Server include a
          Server that has gone unreachable, topological movements of
          significant distance, etc.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="queue" title="Packet Queueing for Mobility">
          <t>AERO Clients and Servers should maintain a samll queue of packets
          they have recently sent to an AERO neighbor, e.g., a 1 second
          window. If the AERO neighbor moves, the AERO node MAY retransmit the
          queued packets to ensure that they are delviered to the AERO
          neighbor's new location.</t>

          <t>Note that this may have performance implications for asymmetric
          paths. For example, if the AERO neighbor moves from a 50mbps link to
          a 128kbps link, retransmitting a 1 second window could cause
          significant congestion. However, any retransmission bursts will
          subside after the 1 second window.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="proxy" title="Proxy AERO">
        <t>Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) <xref target="RFC5213"/><xref
        target="RFC5844"/><xref target="RFC5949"/> presents a network-based
        localized mobility management scheme for use within an access network
        domain. It is typically used in WiFi and cellular wireless access
        networks, and allows Mobile Nodes (MNs) to receive and retain an IP
        address that remains stable within the access network domain without
        needing to implement any special mobility protocols. In the PMIPv6
        architecture, access network devices known as Mobility Access Gateways
        (MAGs) provide MNs with an access link abstraction and receive
        prefixes for the MNs from a Local Mobility Anchor (LMA).</t>

        <t>In a proxy AERO domain, a proxy AERO Client (acting as a MAG) can
        similarly provide proxy services for MNs that do not participate in
        AERO messaging. The proxy Client presents an access link abstraction
        to MNs, and performs DHCPv6 PD exchanges over the AERO interface with
        an AERO Server (acting as an LMA) to receive ACPs for address
        provisioning of new MNs that come onto an access link. This scheme
        assumes that proxy Clients act as fixed (non-mobile) infrastructure
        elements under the same administrative trust basis as for Relays and
        Servers.</t>

        <t>When an MN comes onto an access link within a proxy AERO domain for
        the first time, the proxy Client authenticates the MN and obtains a
        unique identifier that it can use as a DHCPv6 DUID then sends a
        Solicit message to its Server. When the Server delegates an ACP and
        returns a Reply, the proxy Client creates an AERO address for the MN
        and assigns the ACP to the MN's access link. The proxy Client then
        configures itself as a default router for the MN and provides address
        autoconfiguration services (e.g., SLAAC, DHCPv6, DHCPv4, etc.) for
        provisioning MN addresses from the ACP over the access link. Since the
        proxy Client may serve many such MNs simultaneously, it may receive
        multiple ACP delegations and configure multiple AERO addresses, i.e.,
        one for each MN.</t>

        <t>When two MNs are associated with the same proxy Client, the Client
        can forward traffic between the MNs without involving a Server since
        it configures the AERO addresses of both MNs and therefore also has
        the necessary routing information. When two MNs are associated with
        different proxy Clients, the source MN's Client can initiate standard
        AERO link route optimization to discover a direct path to the target
        MN's Client through the exchange of Predirect/Redirect messages.</t>

        <t>When an MN in a proxy AERO domain leaves an access link provided by
        an old proxy Client, the MN issues an access link-specific "leave"
        message that informs the old Client of the link-layer address of a new
        Client on the planned new access link. This is known as a "predictive
        handover". When an MN comes onto an access link provided by a new
        proxy Client, the MN issues an access link-specific "join" message
        that informs the new Client of the link-layer address of the old
        Client on the actual old access link. This is known as a "reactive
        handover".</t>

        <t>Upon receiving a predictive handover indication, the old proxy
        Client sends a Solicit message directly to the new Client and queues
        any arriving data packets addressed to the departed MN. The Solicit
        message includes the MN's ID as the DUID, the ACP in an IA_PD option,
        the old Client's address as the link-layer source address and the new
        Client's address as the link-layer destination address. When the new
        Client receives the Solicit message, it changes the link-layer source
        address to its own address, changes the link-layer destination address
        to the address of its Server, and forwards the message to the Server.
        At the same time, the new Client creates access link state for the ACP
        in anticipation of the MN's arrival (while queuing any data packets
        until the MN arrives), creates a neighbor cache entry for the old
        Client with AcceptTime set to ACCEPT_TIME, then sends a Redirect
        message back to the old Client. When the old Client receives the
        Redirect message, it creates a neighbor cache entry for the new Client
        with ForwardTime set to FORWARD_TIME, then forwards any queued data
        packets to the new Client. At the same time, the old Client sends a
        Release message to its Server. Finally, the old Client sends
        unsolicited Redirect messages to any of the ACP's correspondents with
        a TLLAO containing the link-layer address of the new Client.</t>

        <t>Upon receiving a reactive handover indication, the new proxy Client
        creates access link state for the MN's ACP, sends a Solicit message to
        its Server, and sends a Release message directly to the old Client.
        The Release message includes the MN's ID as the DUID, the ACP in an
        IA_PD option, the new Client's address as the link-layer source
        address and the old Client's address as the link-layer destination
        address. When the old Client receives the Release message, it changes
        the link-layer source address to its own address, changes the
        link-layer destination address to the address of its Server, and
        forwards the message to the Server. At the same time, the old Client
        sends a Predirect message back to the new Client and queues any
        arriving data packets addressed to the departed MN. When the new
        Client receives the Predirect, it creates a neighbor cache entry for
        the old Client with AcceptTime set to ACCEPT_TIME, then sends a
        Redirect message back to the old Client. When the old Client receives
        the Redirect message, it creates a neighbor cache entry for the new
        Client with ForwardTime set to FORWARD_TIME, then forwards any queued
        data packets to the new Client. Finally, the old Client sends
        unsolicited Redirect messages to correspondents the same as for the
        predictive case.</t>

        <t>When a Server processes a Solicit message, it creates a neighbor
        cache entry for this ACP if none currently exists. If a neighbor cache
        entry already exists, however, the Server changes the link-layer
        address to the address of the new proxy Client (this satisfies the
        case of both the old Client and new Client using the same Server).</t>

        <t>When a Server processes a Release message, it resets the neighbor
        cache entry lifetime for this ACP to 3 seconds if the cached
        link-layer address matches the old proxy Client's address. Otherwise,
        the Server ignores the Release message (this satisfies the case of
        both the old Client and new Client using the same Server).</t>

        <t>When a correspondent Client receives an unsolicited Redirect
        message, it changes the link-layer address for the ACP's neighbor
        cache entry to the address of the new proxy Client.</t>

        <t>From an architectural perspective, in addition to the use of DHCPv6
        PD and IPv6 ND signaling the AERO approach differs from PMIPv6 in its
        use of the NBMA virtual link model instead of point-to-point tunnels.
        This provides a more agile interface for Client/Server and
        Client/Client coordinations, and also facilitates simple route
        optimization. The AERO routing system is also arranged in such a
        fashion that Clients get the same service from any Server they happen
        to associate with. This provides a natural fault tolerance and load
        balancing capability such as desired for distributed mobility
        management.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="securitygw"
               title="Extending AERO Links Through Security Gateways">
        <t>When an enterprise mobile device moves from a campus LAN connection
        to a public Internet link, it must re-enter the enterprise via a
        security gateway that has both a physical interface connection to the
        Internet and a physical interface connection to the enterprise
        internetwork. This most often entails the establishment of a Virtual
        Private Network (VPN) link over the public Internet from the mobile
        device to the security gateway. During this process, the mobile device
        supplies the security gateway with its public Internet address as the
        link-layer address for the VPN. The mobile device then acts as an AERO
        Client to negotiate with the security gateway to obtain its ACP.</t>

        <t>In order to satisfy this need, the security gateway also operates
        as an AERO Server with support for AERO Client proxying. In
        particular, when a mobile device (i.e., the Client) connects via the
        security gateway (i.e., the Server), the Server provides the Client
        with an ACP in a DHCPv6 PD exchange the same as if it were attached to
        an enterprise campus access link. The Server then replaces the
        Client's link-layer source address with the Server's enterprise-facing
        link-layer address in all AERO messages the Client sends toward
        neighbors on the AERO link. The AERO messages are then delivered to
        other devices on the AERO link as if they were originated by the
        security gateway instead of by the AERO Client. In the reverse
        direction, the AERO messages sourced by devices within the enterprise
        network can be forwarded to the security gateway, which then replaces
        the link-layer destination address with the Client's link-layer
        address and replaces the link-layer source address with its own
        (Internet-facing) link-layer address.</t>

        <t>After receiving the ACP, the Client can send IP packets that use an
        address taken from the ACP as the network layer source address, the
        Client's link-layer address as the link-layer source address, and the
        Server's Internet-facing link-layer address as the link-layer
        destination address. The Server will then rewrite the link-layer
        source address with the Server's own enterprise-facing link-layer
        address and rewrite the link-layer destination address with the target
        AERO node's link-layer address, and the packets will enter the
        enterprise network as though they were sourced from a device located
        within the enterprise. In the reverse direction, when a packet sourced
        by a node within the enterprise network uses a destination address
        from the Client's ACP, the packet will be delivered to the security
        gateway which then rewrites the link-layer destination address to the
        Client's link-layer address and rewrites the link-layer source address
        to the Server's Internet-facing link-layer address. The Server then
        delivers the packet across the VPN to the AERO Client. In this way,
        the AERO virtual link is essentially extended *through* the security
        gateway to the point at which the VPN link and AERO link are
        effectively grafted together by the link-layer address rewriting
        performed by the security gateway. All AERO messaging services
        (including route optimization and mobility signaling) are therefore
        extended to the Client.</t>

        <t>In order to support this virtual link grafting, the security
        gateway (acting as an AERO Server) must keep static neighbor cache
        entries for all of its associated Clients located on the public
        Internet. The neighbor cache entry is keyed by the AERO Client's AERO
        address the same as if the Client were located within the enterprise
        internetwork. The neighbor cache is then managed in all ways as though
        the Client were an ordinary AERO Client. This includes the AERO IPv6
        ND messaging signaling for Route Optimization and Neighbor
        Unreachability Detection.</t>

        <t>Note that the main difference between a security gateway acting as
        an AERO Server and an enterprise-internal AERO Server is that the
        security gateway has at least one enterprise-internal physical
        interface and at least one public Internet physical interface.
        Conversely, the enterprise-internal AERO Server has only
        enterprise-internal physical interfaces. For this reason security
        gateway proxying is needed to ensure that the public Internet
        link-layer addressing space is kept separate from the
        enterprise-internal link-layer addressing space. This is afforded
        through a natural extension of the security association caching
        already performed for each VPN client by the security gateway.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerointernet"
               title="Extending IPv6 AERO Links to the Internet">
        <t>When an IPv6 host ('H1') with an address from an ACP owned by AERO
        Client ('C1') sends packets to a correspondent IPv6 host ('H2'), the
        packets eventually arrive at the IPv6 router that owns ('H2')s prefix.
        This IPv6 router may or may not be an AERO Client ('C2') either within
        the same home network as ('C1') or in a different home network.</t>

        <t>If Client ('C1') is currently located outside the boundaries of its
        home network, it will connect back into the home network via a
        security gateway acting as an AERO Server. The packets sent by ('H1')
        via ('C1') will then be forwarded through the security gateway then
        through the home network and finally to ('C2') where they will be
        delivered to ('H2'). This could lead to sub-optimal performance when
        ('C2') could instead be reached via a more direct route without
        involving the security gateway.</t>

        <t>Consider the case when host ('H1') has the IPv6 address
        2001:db8:1::1, and Client ('C1') has the ACP 2001:db8:1::/64 with
        underlying IPv6 Internet address of 2001:db8:1000::1. Also, host
        ('H2') has the IPv6 address 2001:db8:2::1, and Client ('C2') has the
        ACP 2001:db8:2::/64 with underlying IPv6 address of 2001:db8:2000::1.
        Client ('C1') can determine whether 'C2' is indeed also an AERO Client
        willing to serve as a route optimization correspondent by resolving
        the AAAA records for the DNS FQDN that matches ('H2')s prefix,
        i.e.:<vspace
        blankLines="1"/>'0.0.0.0.2.0.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.aero.linkupnetworks.net'</t>

        <t>If ('C2') is indeed a candidate correspondent, the FQDN lookup will
        return a PTR resource record that contains the domain name for the
        AERO link that manages ('C2')s ASP. Client ('C1') can then attempt
        route optimization using an approach similar to the Return Routability
        procedure specified for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) <xref target="RFC6275"/>.
        In order to support this process, both Clients MUST intercept and
        decapsulate packets that have a subnet router anycast address
        corresponding to any of the /64 prefixes covered by their respective
        ACPs.</t>

        <t>To initiate the process, Client ('C1') creates a specially-crafted
        encapsulated Predirect message that will be routed through its home
        network then through ('C2')s home network and finally to ('C2')
        itself. Client ('C1') prepares the initial message in the exchange as
        follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header source address is set to
            2001:db8:1:: (i.e., the IPv6 subnet router anycast address for
            ('C1')s ACP)</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header destination address is set to
            2001:db8:2:: (i.e., the IPv6 subnet router anycast address for
            ('C2')s ACP)</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header is followed by any additional
            encapsulation headers</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header source address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C1'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header destination address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:2:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C2'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated Predirect message includes all of the securing
            information that would occur in a MIPv6 "Home Test Init" message
            (format TBD)</t>
          </list>Client ('C1') then further encapsulates the message in the
        encapsulating headers necessary to convey the packet to the security
        gateway (e.g., through IPsec encapsulation) so that the message now
        appears "double-encapsulated". ('C1') then sends the message to the
        security gateway, which re-encapsulates and forwards it over the home
        network from where it will eventually reach ('C2').</t>

        <t>At the same time, ('C1') creates and sends a second encapsulated
        Predirect message that will be routed through the IPv6 Internet
        without involving the security gateway. Client ('C1') prepares the
        message as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header source address is set to
            2001:db8:1000:1 (i.e., the Internet IPv6 address of ('C1'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header destination address is set to
            2001:db8:2:: (i.e., the IPv6 subnet router anycast address for
            ('C2')s ACP)</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header is followed by any additional
            encapsulation headers</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header source address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C1'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header destination address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:2:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C2'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated Predirect message includes all of the securing
            information that would occur in a MIPv6 "Care-of Test Init"
            message (format TBD)</t>
          </list>('C2') will receive both Predirect messages through its home
        network then return a corresponding Redirect for each of the Predirect
        messages with the source and destination addresses in the inner and
        outer headers reversed. The first message includes all of the securing
        information that would occur in a MIPv6 "Home Test" message, while the
        second message includes all of the securing information that would
        occur in a MIPv6 "Care-of Test" message (formats TBD).</t>

        <t>When ('C1') receives the Redirect messages, it performs the
        necessary security procedures per the MIPv6 specification. It then
        prepares an encapsulated NS message that includes the same source and
        destination addresses as for the "Care-of Test Init" Predirect
        message, and includes all of the securing information that would occur
        in a MIPv6 "Binding Update" message (format TBD) and sends the message
        to ('C2').</t>

        <t>When ('C2') receives the NS message, if the securing information is
        correct it creates or updates a neighbor cache entry for ('C1') with
        fe80::2001:db8:1:0 as the network-layer address, 2001:db8:1000::1 as
        the link-layer address and with AcceptTime set to ACCEPT_TIME. ('C2')
        then sends an encapsulated NA message back to ('C1') that includes the
        same source and destination addresses as for the "Care-of Test"
        Redirect message, and includes all of the securing information that
        would occur in a MIPv6 "Binding Acknowledgement" message (format TBD)
        and sends the message to ('C1').</t>

        <t>When ('C1') receives the NA message, it creates or updates a
        neighbor cache entry for ('C2') with fe80::2001:db8:2:0 as the
        network-layer address and 2001:db8:2:: as the link-layer address and
        with ForwardTime set to FORWARD_TIME, thus completing the route
        optimization in the forward direction.</t>

        <t>('C1') subsequently forwards encapsulated packets with outer source
        address 2001:db8:1000::1, with outer destination address 2001:db8:2::,
        with inner source address taken from the 2001:db8:1::, and with inner
        destination address taken from 2001:db8:2:: due to the fact that it
        has a securely-established neighbor cache entry with non-zero
        ForwardTime. ('C2') subsequently accepts any such encapsulated packets
        due to the fact that it has a securely-established neighbor cache
        entry with non-zero AcceptTime.</t>

        <t>In order to keep neighbor cache entries alive, ('C1') periodically
        sends additional NS messages to ('C2') and receives any NA responses.
        If ('C1') moves to a different point of attachment after the initial
        route optimization, it sends a new secured NS message to ('C2') as
        above to update ('C2')s neighbor cache.</t>

        <t>If ('C2') has packets to send to ('C1'), it performs a
        corresponding route optimization in the opposite direction following
        the same procedures described above. In the process, the
        already-established unidirectional neighbor cache entries within
        ('C1') and ('C2') are updated to include the now-bidirectional
        information. In particular, the AcceptTime and ForwardTime variables
        for both neighbor cache entries are updated to non-zero values, and
        the link-layer address for ('C1')s neighbor cache entry for ('C2') is
        reset to 2001:db8:2000::1.</t>

        <t>Note that two AERO Clients can use full security protocol messaging
        instead of Return Routability, e.g., if strong authentication and/or
        confidentiality are desired. In that case, security protocol key
        exchanges such as specified for MOBIKE <xref target="RFC4555"/> would
        be used to establish security associations and neighbor cache entries
        between the AERO clients. Thereafter, NS/NA messaging can be used to
        maintain neighbor cache entries, test reachability, and to announce
        mobility events. If reachability testing fails, e.g., if both Clients
        move at roughly the same time, the Clients can tear down the security
        association and neighbor cache entries and again allow packets to flow
        through their home network.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nodhcp"
               title="Operation on AERO Links Without DHCPv6 Services">
        <t>When Servers on the AERO link do not provide DHCPv6 services,
        operation can still be accommodated through administrative
        configuration of ACPs on AERO Clients. In that case, administrative
        configurations of AERO interface neighbor cache entries on both the
        Server and Client are also necessary. However, this may interfere with
        the ability for Clients to dynamically change to new Servers, and can
        expose the AERO link to misconfigurations unless the administrative
        configurations are carefully coordinated.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="serverless" title="Operation on Server-less AERO Links">
        <t>In some AERO link scenarios, there may be no Servers on the link
        and/or no need for Clients to use a Server as an intermediary trust
        anchor. In that case, each Client acts as a Server unto itself to
        establish neighbor cache entries by performing direct Client-to-Client
        IPv6 ND message exchanges, and some other form of trust basis must be
        applied so that each Client can verify that the prospective neighbor
        is authorized to use its claimed ACP.</t>

        <t>When there is no Server on the link, Clients must arrange to
        receive ACPs and publish them via a secure alternate PD authority
        through some means outside the scope of this document.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="noclient"
               title="AERO Operation without DHCPv6 Client/Server Exchanges">
        <t>In some environments, the AERO service may be useful for mobile
        nodes that do not implement the AERO Client function and do not
        perform encapsulation. For example, if the mobile node has a way of
        injecting its ACP into the access network routing system an AERO
        Server connected to the same access network can accept the ACP prefix
        injection as an indication that a new mobile node has come onto the
        link. The Server can then inject the ACP into the BGP routing system
        the same as if an AERO Client/Server DHCPv6 exchange had occurred. If
        the mobile node subsequently withdraws the ACP from the access network
        routing system, the Server can then withrdaw the ACP from the BGP
        routing system.</t>

        <t>In this arrangement, AERO Servers and Relays are used in exactly
        the same ways as for environments where DHCPv6 Client/Server exchanges
        are supported. However, the access network routing systems must be
        capable of accommodating rapid ACP injections and withrawls from
        mobile nodes with the understanding that the information must be
        propagated to all routers in the system. Operational expereince has
        shown that this kind of routing system "churn" can lead to overall
        instability and inconsistency in the routing system.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="static-tunnel" title="Manually-Configured AERO Tunnels">
        <t>In addition to the dynamic neighbor discovery procedures for AERO
        link neighbors described above, AERO encapsulation can be applied to
        manually-configured tunnels. In that case, the tunnel endpoints use an
        administratively-assigned link-local address and exchange NS/NA
        messages the same as for dynamically-established tunnels.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="pointtopoint"
               title="Encapsulation Avoidance on Relay-Server Dedicated Links">
        <t>In some environments, AERO Servers and Relays may be connected by
        dedicated point-to-point links, e.g., high speed fiberoptic leased
        lines. In that case, the Servers and Relays can participate in the
        AERO link the same as specified above but can avoid encapsulation over
        the dedicated links. In that case, however, the links would be
        dedicated for AERO and could not be multiplexed for both AERO and
        non-AERO communications.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="version"
               title="Encapsulation Protocol Version Considerations">
        <t>A source Client may connect only to an IPvX underlying network,
        while the target Client connects only to an IPvY underlying network.
        In that case, the target and source Clients have no means for reaching
        each other directly (since they connect to underlying networks of
        different IP protocol versions) and so must ignore any redirection
        messages and continue to send packets via their Servers.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="mcast" title="Multicast Considerations">
        <t>When the underlying network does not support multicast, AERO
        Clients map link-scoped multicast addresses to the link-layer address
        of a Server, which acts as a multicast forwarding agent. The AERO
        Client also serves as an IGMP/MLD Proxy for its EUNs and/or hosted
        applications per <xref target="RFC4605"/> while using the link-layer
        address of the Server as the link-layer address for all multicast
        packets.</t>

        <t>When the underlying network supports multicast, AERO nodes use the
        multicast address mapping specification found in <xref
        target="RFC2529"/> for IPv4 underlying networks and use a TBD
        site-scoped multicast mapping for IPv6 underlying networks. In that
        case, border routers must ensure that the encapsulated site-scoped
        multicast packets do not leak outside of the site spanned by the AERO
        link.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="implement" title="Implementation Status">
      <t>User-level and kernel-level AERO implementations have been developed
      and are undergoing internal testing within Boeing.</t>

      <t>An initial public release of the AERO source code was announced on
      the intarea mailing list on August 21, 2015, and a pointer to the code
      is available in the list archives.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>The IANA has assigned a 4-octet Private Enterprise Number "45282" for
      AERO in the "enterprise-numbers" registry.</t>

      <t>The IANA has assigned the UDP port number "8060" for an earlier
      experimental version of AERO <xref target="RFC6706"/>. This document
      obsoletes <xref target="RFC6706"/> and claims the UDP port number "8060"
      for all future use.</t>

      <t>No further IANA actions are required.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="secure" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>AERO link security considerations are the same as for standard IPv6
      Neighbor Discovery <xref target="RFC4861"/> except that AERO improves on
      some aspects. In particular, AERO uses a trust basis between Clients and
      Servers, where the Clients only engage in the AERO mechanism when it is
      facilitated by a trust anchor.</t>

      <t>Redirect, Predirect and unsolicited NA messages SHOULD include a
      Timestamp option (see Section 5.3 of <xref target="RFC3971"/>) that
      other AERO nodes can use to verify the message time of origin.
      Predirect, NS and RS messages SHOULD include a Nonce option (see Section
      5.3 of <xref target="RFC3971"/>) that recipients echo back in
      corresponding responses.</t>

      <t>AERO links must be protected against link-layer address spoofing
      attacks in which an attacker on the link pretends to be a trusted
      neighbor. Links that provide link-layer securing mechanisms (e.g., IEEE
      802.1X WLANs) and links that provide physical security (e.g., enterprise
      network wired LANs) provide a first line of defense, however AERO nodes
      SHOULD also use DHCPv6 securing services (e.g., Secure DHCPv6 <xref
      target="I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6"/>, etc.) for Client authentication and
      network admission control.</t>

      <t>AERO Clients MUST ensure that their connectivity is not used by
      unauthorized nodes on their EUNs to gain access to a protected network,
      i.e., AERO Clients that act as routers MUST NOT provide routing services
      for unauthorized nodes. (This concern is no different than for ordinary
      hosts that receive an IP address delegation but then "share" the address
      with unauthorized nodes via some form of Internet connection
      sharing.)</t>

      <t>AERO Clients, Servers and Relays on the open Internet are suceptible
      to the same attack profiles as for any Internet nodes. For this reason,
      IP security MUST be used when AERO is employed over unmanaged/unsecured
      links using securing mechanisms such as IPsec <xref target="RFC4301"/>,
      IKE <xref target="RFC5996"/> and/or TLS <xref target="RFC5246"/>.</t>

      <t>AERO Servers and Relays present targets for traffic amplification
      Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. This concern is no different than for
      widely-deployed VPN security gateways in the Internet, where attackers
      could send spoofed packets to the gateways at high data rates. This
      becomes less of a problem when Relays and Servers are connected by
      dedicated links with no connections to the Internet and/or when
      connections to the Internet asre only permitted through well-managed
      firewalls.</t>

      <t>Traffic amplfication DoS attacks can also target an AERO Client's low
      data rate links. This is a concern not only for Clients located on the
      open Internet but also for Clients in protected enclaves. AERO Servers
      can institute rate limits that protect Clients from receiving packet
      floods that could DoS low data rate links.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>Discussions both on IETF lists and in private exchanges helped shape
      some of the concepts in this work. Individuals who contributed insights
      include Mikael Abrahamsson, Mark Andrews, Fred Baker, Stewart Bryant,
      Brian Carpenter, Wojciech Dec, Ralph Droms, Adrian Farrel, Sri
      Gundavelli, Brian Haberman, Joel Halpern, Tom Herbert, Sascha Hlusiak,
      Lee Howard, Andre Kostur, Ted Lemon, Andy Malis, Satoru Matsushima,
      Tomek Mrugalski, Alexandru Petrescu, Behcet Saikaya, Joe Touch, Bernie
      Volz, Ryuji Wakikawa and Lloyd Wood. Members of the IESG also provided
      valuable input during their review process that greatly improved the
      document. Discussions on the v6ops list in the December 2015 through
      January 2016 timeframe further helped clarify AERO multi-addressing
      capabilities. Special thanks go to Stewart Bryant, Joel Halpern and
      Brian Haberman for their shepherding guidance during the publication of
      the AERO first edition.</t>

      <t>This work has further been encouraged and supported by Boeing
      colleagues including M. Wayne Benson, Dave Bernhardt, Cam Brodie,
      Balaguruna Chidambaram, Irene Chin, Bruce Cornish, Claudiu Danilov, Wen
      Fang, Anthony Gregory, Jeff Holland, Ed King, Gen MacLean, Rob
      Muszkiewicz, Sean O'Sullivan, Kent Shuey, Brian Skeen, Mike Slane,
      Brendan Williams, Julie Wulff, Yueli Yang, and other members of the
      BR&amp;T and BIT mobile networking teams. Wayne Benson is especially
      acknowledged for his outstanding work in converting the AERO
      proof-of-concept implementation into production-ready code.</t>

      <t>Earlier works on NBMA tunneling approaches are found in <xref
      target="RFC2529"/><xref target="RFC5214"/><xref target="RFC5569"/>.</t>

      <t>Many of the constructs presented in this second edition of AERO are
      based on the author's earlier works, including:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON) <xref
          target="RFC6179"/><xref target="I-D.templin-ironbis"/></t>

          <t>Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) <xref target="RFC5558"/><xref
          target="I-D.templin-intarea-vet"/></t>

          <t>The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) <xref
          target="RFC5320"/><xref target="I-D.templin-intarea-seal"/></t>

          <t>AERO, First Edition <xref target="RFC6706"/></t>
        </list>Note that these works cite numerous earlier efforts that are
      not also cited here due to space limitations. The authors of those
      earlier works are acknowledged for their insights.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0768"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0791"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0792"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2003"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2460"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2473"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2474"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4213"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4861"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4862"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6434"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3633"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3315"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3971"?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2675"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1930"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2529"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5214"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4301"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5569"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6204"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6980"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0879"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4821"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6691"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6935"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6936"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6438"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6706"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4963"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6864"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6146"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7078"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5996"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6939"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5522"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4994"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5494"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5246"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6355"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2923"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3819"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4443"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1812"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2131"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5213"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5844"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6275"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4555"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1191"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1981"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1035"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4592"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3596"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6179"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5320"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5558"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5720"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2784"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2890"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5949"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6241"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2983"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3168"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2764"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6221"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6422"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4511"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4605"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1122"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4459"?>

      <reference anchor="TUNTAP">
        <front>
          <title>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TUN/TAP</title>

          <author fullname="Wikipedia" initials="W" surname="Wikipedia">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2014"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-ironbis"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-seal"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-vet"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.herbert-gue-fragmentation"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-nvo3-gue"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-grefrag"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"?>
    </references>

    <section anchor="minimal" title="AERO Alternate Encapsulations">
      <t>When GUE encapsulation is not needed, AERO can use common
      encapsulations such as IP-in-IP <xref target="RFC2003"/><xref
      target="RFC2473"/><xref target="RFC4213"/>, Generic Routing
      Encapsulation (GRE) <xref target="RFC2784"/><xref target="RFC2890"/> and
      others. The encapsulation is therefore only differentiated from non-AERO
      tunnels through the application of AERO control messaging and not
      through, e.g., a well-known UDP port number.</t>

      <t>As for GUE encapsulation, alternate AERO encapsulation formats may
      require encapsulation layer fragmentation. For simple IP-in-IP
      encapsulation, an IPv6 fragment header is inserted directly between the
      inner and outer IP headers when needed, i.e., even if the outer header
      is IPv4. The IPv6 Fragment Header is identified to the outer IP layer by
      its IP protocol number, and the Next Header field in the IPv6 Fragment
      Header identifies the inner IP header version. For GRE encapsulation, a
      GRE fragment header is inserted within the GRE header <xref
      target="I-D.templin-intarea-grefrag"/>.</t>

      <t><xref target="encaps"/> shows the AERO IP-in-IP encapsulation format
      before any fragmentation is applied:</t>

      <figure anchor="encaps"
              title="Minimal Encapsulation Format using IP-in-IP">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |     Outer IPv4 Header     |      |    Outer IPv6 Header      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |IPv6 Frag Header (optional)|      |IPv6 Frag Header (optional)|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      Inner IP Header      |      |       Inner IP Header     |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                           |      |                           |
     ~                           ~      ~                           ~
     ~    Inner Packet Body      ~      ~     Inner Packet Body     ~
     ~                           ~      ~                           ~
     |                           |      |                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

     Minimal Encapsulation in IPv4      Minimal Encapsulation in IPv6

]]></artwork>
      </figure>

      <t><xref target="gre-encaps"/> shows the AERO GRE encapsulation format
      before any fragmentation is applied:</t>

      <t><figure anchor="gre-encaps" title="Minimal Encapsulation Using GRE">
          <artwork><![CDATA[
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Outer IP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          GRE Header           |
     | (with checksum, key, etc..)   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | GRE Fragment Header (optional)|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Inner IP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                               |
     ~                               ~
     ~      Inner Packet Body        ~
     ~                               ~
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>

      <t>Alternate encapsulation may be preferred in environments where GUE
      encapsulation would add unnecessary overhead. For example, certain
      low-bandwidth wireless data links may benefit from a reduced
      encapsulation overhead.</t>

      <t>GUE encapsulation can traverse network paths that are inaccessible to
      non-UDP encapsulations, e.g., for crossing Network Address Translators
      (NATs). More and more, network middleboxes are also being configured to
      discard packets that include anything other than a well-known IP
      protocol such as UDP and TCP. It may therefore be necessary to determine
      the potential for middlebox filtering before enabling alternate
      encapsulation in a given environment.</t>

      <t>In addition to IP-in-IP, GRE and GUE, AERO can also use security
      encapsulations such as IPsec and SSL/TLS. In that case, AERO control
      messaging and route determination occur before security encapsulation is
      applied for outgoing packets and after security decapsulation is applied
      for incoming packets.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="whentoinsert"
             title="When to Insert an Encapsulation Fragment Header">
      <t>An encapsulation fragment header is inserted when the AERO tunnel
      ingress needs to apply fragmentation to accommodate packets that must be
      delivered without loss due to a size restriction. Fragmentation is
      performed on the inner packet while encapsulating each inner packet
      fragment in outer IP and encapsulation layer headers that differ only in
      the fragment header fields.</t>

      <t>The fragment header can also be inserted in order to include a
      coherent Identification value with each packet, e.g., to aid in
      Duplicate Packet Detection (DPD). In this way, network nodes can cache
      the Identification values of recently-seen packets and use the cached
      values to determine whether a newly-arrived packet is in fact a
      duplicate. The Identification value within each packet could further
      provide a rough indicator of packet reordering, e.g., in cases when the
      tunnel egress wishes to discard packets that are grossly out of
      order.</t>

      <t>In some use cases, there may be operational assurance that no
      fragmentation of any kind will be necessary, or that only occasional
      large control messages will require fragmentation. In that case, the
      encapsulation fragment header can be omitted and ordinary fragmentation
      of the outer IP protocol version can be applied when necessary.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Autoconfiguration for Constrained Platforms">
      <t>On some platforms (e.g., popular cell phone operating systems), the
      act of assigning a default IPv6 route and/or assigning an address to an
      interface may not be permitted from a user application due to security
      policy. Typically, those platforms include a TUN/TAP interface <xref
      target="TUNTAP"/> that acts as a point-to-point conduit between user
      applications and the AERO interface. In that case, the Client can
      instead generate a "synthesized RA" message. The message conforms to
      <xref target="RFC4861"/> and is prepared as follows:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>the IPv6 source address is the Client's AERO address</t>

          <t>the IPv6 destination address is all-nodes multicast</t>

          <t>the Router Lifetime is set to a time that is no longer than the
          ACP DHCPv6 lifetime</t>

          <t>the message does not include a Source Link Layer Address Option
          (SLLAO)</t>

          <t>the message includes a Prefix Information Option (PIO) with a /64
          prefix taken from the ACP as the prefix for autoconfiguration</t>
        </list>The Client then sends the synthesized RA message via the
      TUN/TAP interface, where the operating system kernel will interpret it
      as though it were generated by an actual router. The operating system
      will then install a default route and use StateLess Address
      AutoConfiguration (SLAAC) to configure an IPv6 address on the TUN/TAP
      interface. Methods for similarly installing an IPv4 default route and
      IPv4 address on the TUN/TAP interface are based on synthesized DHCPv4
      messages <xref target="RFC2131"/>.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
